Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 15;3(1):106-111.
doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50106. eCollection 2019 Feb.

Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer

P Boström  1 , M M Haapamäki  1 , J Rutegård  1 , P Matthiessen  2 , M Rutegård  1
Affiliations

Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer

P Boström et al. BJS Open. .

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer may result in death. The aim of this study was to yield an updated, population-based estimate of postoperative mortality and evaluate possible interacting factors.

Methods: This was a retrospective national cohort study of patients who underwent anterior resection between 2007 and 2016. Data were retrieved from a prospectively developed database. Anastomotic leakage constituted exposure, whereas outcome was defined as death within 90 days of surgery. Logistic regression analyses, using directed acyclic graphs to evaluate possible confounders, were performed, including interaction analyses.

Results: Of 6948 patients, 693 (10·0 per cent) experienced anastomotic leakage and 294 (4·2 per cent) underwent reintervention due to leakage. The mortality rate was 1·5 per cent in patients without leakage and 3·9 per cent in those with leakage. In multivariable analysis, leakage was associated with increased mortality only when a reintervention was performed (odds ratio (OR) 5·57, 95 per cent c.i. 3·29 to 9·44). Leaks not necessitating reintervention did not result in increased mortality (OR 0·70, 0·25 to 1·96). There was evidence of interaction between leakage and age on a multiplicative scale (P = 0·007), leading to a substantial mortality increase in elderly patients with leakage.

Conclusion: Anastomotic leakage, in particular severe leakage, led to a significant increase in 90-day mortality, with a more pronounced risk of death in the elderly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Predicted 90‐day postoperative mortality after anterior resection for rectal cancer according to age, for patients with and without anastomotic leakage
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G, Makin G. The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 71–79. - PubMed
    1. den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Påhlman L, Folkesson J et al Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1066–1075. - PubMed
    1. Bakker IS, Snijders HS, Wouters MW, Havenga K, Tollenaar RA, Wiggers T et al High complication rate after low anterior resection for mid and high rectal cancer; results of a population‐based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40: 692–698. - PubMed
    1. Carlsen E, Schlichting E, Guldvog I, Johnson E, Heald RJ. Effect of the introduction of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 526–529. - PubMed
    1. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T et al; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 211–216. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms