Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jun;16(3):665-673.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13078. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

Using the Braden subscales to assess risk of pressure injuries in adult patients: A retrospective case-control study

Ellene Lim  1 , Zubaidah Mordiffi  2 , Han S J Chew  3 , Violeta Lopez  4
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Using the Braden subscales to assess risk of pressure injuries in adult patients: A retrospective case-control study

Ellene Lim et al. Int Wound J. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the pressure injury risk predictability between the individual Braden subscales and the total Braden scale in adult inpatients in Singapore. A retrospective 1:1 case-control design was used from a sample of 199 patient medical records. Clinical data were collected from a local university hospital's medical records database. The results showed that, among the six subscales, the activity subscale was the most sensitive and specific in predicting pressure injury (PI). However, the overall results showed that the Braden scale remained the most predictive of PI development in comparison with the individual subscales. The study also found that, among the Singaporean patients, the Braden cut-off score for PI risk was 17 compared with the current cut-off score of 18. Therefore, it may be relevant for local tertiary hospitals to review their respective Braden cut-off scores as the study results indicate an over-prediction of PI risk, which leads to unnecessary utilisation of resources. The hospital may also consider developing a PI prevention bundle comprising commonly used preventive interventions when at least one Braden subscale reflects a suboptimal score.

Keywords: Braden scale; Braden subscales; pressure injury; retrospective study; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Edsberg LE, Black JM, Goldberg M, McNichol L, Moore L, Sieggreen M. Revised national pressure ulcer advisory panel pressure injury staging system: revised pressure injury staging system. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016;43(6):588‐597. 10.1097/WON.0000000000000281. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mordiffi SZ, Kent B, Phillips N, Chi Tho P. Use of mobility subscale for risk assessment of pressure ulcer incidence and preventive interventions: a systematic review. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(56):2417‐2481. - PubMed
    1. Werku EE, Zeleke AM, Belachew MH. Nurses' knowledge and perceived barriers about pressure ulcer prevention for admitted patients in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Am J Inter Med. 2017;5(4):1‐16. 10.11648/j.ajim.s.2017050401.11. - DOI
    1. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), & Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA) . Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. E. Haesler (Ed.). Osborne Park, Western Australia: Cambridge Media; 2014.
    1. Agrawal K, Chauhan N. Pressure ulcers: back to the basics. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012;45(2):244‐254. 10.4103/0970-0358.101287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types