A Comparison between 6-point Dixon MRI and MR Spectroscopy to Quantify Muscle Fat in the Thigh of Subjects with Sarcopenia
- PMID: 30734827
- PMCID: PMC12275662
- DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2018.16
A Comparison between 6-point Dixon MRI and MR Spectroscopy to Quantify Muscle Fat in the Thigh of Subjects with Sarcopenia
Abstract
Background: Changes in muscle fat composition as for example observed in sarcopenia, affect physical performance and muscular function, like strength and power.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare 6-point Dixon magnetic resonance imaging and multi-echo magnetic resonance spectroscopy sequences to quantify muscle fat. Setting, participants and measurements: Two groups were recruited (G1: 23 healthy young men (28 ± 4 years), G2: 56 men with sarcopenia (80 ± 5 years)). Proton density fat fraction was measured with a 6-point product and a 6-point prototype Dixon sequence in the left thigh muscle and with a high-speed multi-echo T2*-corrected H1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy sequence within the semitendinosus muscle of the left thigh. To evaluate the comparability among the different methods, Bland-Altman and linear regression analyses of the proton density fat fraction results were performed.
Results: Mean differences ± 1.96 * standard deviation between spectroscopy and 6pt Dixon sequences were 1.9 ± 3.3% and 1.5 ± 3.6% for the product and prototype sequences, respectively. High correlations were measured between the proton density fat fraction results of the 6-point Dixon sequences and spectroscopy (R = 0.95 for the product sequence and R = 0.97 for the prototype sequence).
Conclusions: Dixon imaging and spectroscopy sequences show comparable accuracy for fat measurements in the thigh. Spectroscopy is a local measurement, whereas Dixon sequences provide maps of the fat distribution. The high correlations of the 6-point Dixon sequences with spectroscopy support their clinical use. They provide higher spatial resolution than spectroscopy, but are not suitable for a more complicated spectral analysis to separate extra- and intramyocellular lipids.
Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; sarcopenia; thigh.
Conflict of interest statement
Co-authors Heiko Meyer, PhD, Mathias Nittka, PhD, Marcel D. Nickel, PhD, and Esther Raithel, PhD, are employees of Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany. No other author has any conflict of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Kullberg J, Johansson L, Ahlstrom H, et al. Automated assessment of whole-body adipose tissue depots from continuously moving bed MRI: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:185–193. 10.1002/jmri.21820 PubMed PMID: 19557740. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ludwig UA, Klausmann F, Baumann S, et al. Whole-body MRI-based fat quantification: a comparison to air displacement plethysmography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40:1437–1444. 10.1002/jmri.24509 PubMed PMID: 24449401. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Thomas LE, Saeed N, Hajnal JV, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of total body fat. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85:1778–1785. 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.5.1778 PubMed PMID: 9804581. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dixon TW. Simple Proton Spectroscopic Imaging. Radiology. 1984;153:189–194. 10.1148/radiology.153.1.6089263 PubMed PMID: 6089263. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pineda N, Sharma P, Xu Q, Hu X, Vos M, Martin DR. High-Speed T2-Corrected Multiecho Acquisition at 1H MR Spectroscopy— A Rapid and Accurate Technique. Radiology. 2009;252:568–576. 10.1148/radiol.2523082084 PubMed PMID: 19546430. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
