Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jul;29(5):975-982.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02395-6. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

Clinical comparison between simple laminectomy and laminectomy plus posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Clinical comparison between simple laminectomy and laminectomy plus posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy

G Gargiulo et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Posterior stabilization in patients treated with laminectomy for spondylotic cervical myelopathy is still a debate. Despite both being reported in literature by several authors, some controversies still exist. The aim of this study is to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients treated with laminectomy or laminectomy with posterior stabilization.

Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 42 patients affected by cervical myelopathy (mean age 70.43 ± 5.03 years), 19 treated with laminectomy (group A) and 23 with laminectomy and posterior instrumentation (group B). Neurological status was assessed with Nurick scale, pain with VAS and radiological parameters with C2-C7 SVA, T1 slope and C2-C7 lordosis, clinical function with modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA). Also, surgery time and blood loss were recorded. Student's t test was used for continuous variables, while Kruskal-Wallis test was used for categorical values.

Results: No differences were found in postoperative Nurick scale (p = 0.587), VAS (p = 0.62), mJOA (p = 0.197) and T1 slope (p = 0.559), while laminectomy with fusion showed better postoperative cervical lordosis (p = 0.007) and C2-C7 SVA (p < 0.00001), but higher blood loss (p < 0.00001) and surgical time (p < 0.00001). Both groups showed better Nurick scale (p = 0.00017 for group A and p = 0.00081 for group B), VAS (p = 0.02 for group A and p = 0.046 for group B) and mJOA (p < 0.00001 for both groups) than preoperative values.

Conclusions: Both treatments are a valuable choice, offering some benefits and disadvantages against each other. Each procedure must be carefully evaluated on the basis of patients' general status, preoperative pain, signs of instability and potential benefits from cervical alignment correction.

Keywords: Elderly; Laminectomy; Lateral mass screw; Posterior fusion; Spondylotic cervical myelopathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Nov;27(5):508-517 - PubMed
    1. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013 Apr;24(2):249-74 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Mar 1;22(5):573-7; discussion 578 - PubMed
    1. Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 2:168-85 - PubMed
    1. Indian J Orthop. 2017 Nov-Dec;51(6):658-665 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources