Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;89(6):1160-1168.e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.030. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP: results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees

Sachin Wani  1 Samuel Han  1 Violette Simon  1 Matthew Hall  2 Dayna Early  3 Eva Aagaard  3 Wasif M Abidi  4 Subhas Banerjee  5 Todd H Baron  6 Michael Bartel  7 Erik Bowman  8 Brian C Brauer  1 Jonathan M Buscaglia  9 Linda Carlin  1 Amitabh Chak  10 Hemant Chatrath  11 Abhishek Choudhary  5 Bradley Confer  12 Gregory A Coté  13 Koushik K Das  3 Christopher J DiMaio  14 Andrew M Dries  15 Steven A Edmundowicz  1 Abdul Hamid El Chafic  16 Ihab El Hajj  17 Swan Ellert  1 Jason Ferreira  18 Anthony Gamboa  19 Ian S Gan  20 Lisa Gangarosa  6 Bhargava Gannavarapu  21 Stuart R Gordon  18 Nalini M Guda  22 Hazem T Hammad  1 Cynthia Harris  23 Sujai Jalaj  6 Paul Jowell  24 Sana Kenshil  25 Jason Klapman  23 Michael L Kochman  26 Sri Komanduri  21 Gabriel Lang  3 Linda S Lee  4 David E Loren  16 Frank J Lukens  7 Daniel Mullady  3 Raman V Muthusamy  11 Andrew S Nett  27 Mojtaba S Olyaee  28 Kavous Pakseresht  28 Pranith Perera  27 Patrick Pfau  8 Cyrus Piraka  29 John M Poneros  30 Amit Rastogi  28 Anthony Razzak  20 Brian Riff  14 Shreyas Saligram  23 James M Scheiman  27 Isaiah Schuster  9 Raj J Shah  1 Rishi Sharma  31 Joshua P Spaete  24 Ajaypal Singh  10 Muhammad Sohail  32 Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah  33 Tyler Stevens  12 James H Tabibian  26 Demetrios Tzimas  9 Dushant S Uppal  34 Shiro Urayama  31 Domenico Vitterbo  33 Andrew Y Wang  34 Wahid Wassef  32 Patrick Yachimski  19 Sergio Zepeda-Gomez  25 Tobias Zuchelli  29 Rajesh N Keswani  21
Affiliations

Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP: results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees

Sachin Wani et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background and aims: Minimum EUS and ERCP volumes that should be offered per trainee in "high quality" advanced endoscopy training programs (AETPs) are not established. We aimed to define the number of procedures required by an "average" advanced endoscopy trainee (AET) to achieve competence in technical and cognitive EUS and ERCP tasks to help structure AETPs.

Methods: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)-recognized AETPs were invited to participate; AETs were graded on every fifth EUS and ERCP examination using a validated tool. Grading for each skill was done using a 4-point scoring system, and learning curves using cumulative sum analysis for overall, technical, and cognitive components of EUS and ERCP were shared with AETs and trainers quarterly. Generalized linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept for each AET were used to generate aggregate learning curves, allowing us to use data from all AETs to estimate the average learning experience for trainees.

Results: Among 62 invited AETPs, 37 AETs from 32 AETPs participated. Most AETs reported hands-on EUS (52%, median 20 cases) and ERCP (68%, median 50 cases) experience before starting an AETP. The median number of EUS and ERCPs performed per AET was 400 (range, 200-750) and 361 (range, 250-650), respectively. Overall, 2616 examinations were graded (EUS, 1277; ERCP-biliary, 1143; pancreatic, 196). Most graded EUS examinations were performed for pancreatobiliary indications (69.9%) and ERCP examinations for ASGE biliary grade of difficulty 1 (72.1%). The average AET achieved competence in core EUS and ERCP skills at approximately 225 and 250 cases, respectively. However, overall technical competence was achieved for grade 2 ERCP at about 300 cases.

Conclusion: The thresholds provided for an average AET to achieve competence in EUS and ERCP may be used by the ASGE and AETPs in establishing the minimal standards for case volume exposure for AETs during their training. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02509416.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Graphical representation of learning curves.
Overall aggregate graphs using cumulative sum analysis demonstrating the mean number of cases (evaluation number multiplied by 5) needed for competency for an average advanced endoscopy trainee

References

    1. Wani S, Keswani RN, Petersen B, et al. Training in EUS and ERCP: standardizing methods to assess competence. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;87:1371–1382. - PubMed
    1. Wani S, Keswani RN, Han S, et al. Competence in endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, from training through independent practice. Gastroenterology 2018;(in press). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elta GH, Jorgensen J, Coyle WJ. Training in interventional endoscopy: current and future state. Gastroenterology 2015;148:488–90. - PubMed
    1. Cote GA, Singh S, Bucksot LG, et al. Association between volume of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at an academic medical center and use of pancreatobiliary therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:920–4. - PubMed
    1. Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach 2010;32:638–45. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data