Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 15:379:65-81.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Oct 21.

Nanoscale Metal-Organic Frameworks for Phototherapy of Cancer

Affiliations

Nanoscale Metal-Organic Frameworks for Phototherapy of Cancer

Guangxu Lan et al. Coord Chem Rev. .

Abstract

Phototherapy involves the irradiation of tissues with light, and is commonly implemented in the forms of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photothermal therapy (PTT). Photosensitizers (PSs) are often needed to improve the efficacy and selectivity of phototherapy via enhanced singlet oxygen generation in PDT and photothermal responses in PTT. In both cases, efficient and selective delivery of PSs to the diseased tissues is of paramount importance. Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks (nMOFs), a new class of hybrid materials built from metal connecting points and bridging ligands, have been examined as nanocarriers for drug delivery due to their compositional and structural tunability, highly porous structures, and good biocompatibility. This review summarizes recent advances on using nMOFs as nanoparticle PSs for applications in PDT and PTT.

Keywords: Metal-organic framework; Nanophotosensitizers; Photodynamic therapy; Photothermal therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(a) TEM image and (b) high-resolution TEM image of DBP-Hf. (c) Singlet oxygen generation of DBP-Hf, H2DBP, and H2DBP+HfCl4 with SOSG assay. (d) In vitro PDT cytotoxicity of DBP-Hf and H2DBP. (e) In vivo tumor growth inhibition curve of DBP-Hf and H2DBP. Black and red arrows refer to the time of injection and light irradiation, respectively. Reprinted with permission form ref. [127]. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a) TEM image of DBC-Hf. Uv-vis spectra (b) and singlet oxygen generation (c) of DBC-Hf, DBP-Hf, H2DBC and H2DBP. Tumor growth inhibition curves after PDT treatment in CT26 (e) and HT29 (f) models. Red arrows refer to the time of light irradiation. Reprinted with permission form ref. [128]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(a) Schematic presentation of singlet oxygen generation by Hf-TCPP-PEG. (b) TEM image of Hf-TCPP. (c) Blood circulation of Hf-TCPP-PEG in healthy mice. (d) Biodistribution of Hf-TCPP-PEG in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice at 12 h post injection. Reprinted with permission form ref. [131]. Copyright 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) TEM images of PCN-224 with different sizes. (b) In vitro PDT cytotoxicity efficacy of different sized PCN-224. (c) In vitro PDT cytotoxicity efficacy of pristine PCN-224 and 1/4FA-PCN-224 in HeLa cells. Reprinted with permission form ref. [134]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Proposed mechanism of energy transfer in SO-PCN and illustration of switching operation in SO-PCN. Reprinted with permission form ref. [130]. Copyright 2015 Wiley.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
(a) Proposed mechanism of synthesis of UiO-PDT. (b) Singlet oxygen generation of UiO-PDT and I2-BDP with DPBF assay. (c) In vitro PDT cytotoxicity efficacy of UiO-PDT and I2-BDP in B16F10 cells. Reprinted with permission of ref. [135]. Copyright 2016 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
(a) Schematic presentation of combined PDT and immunotherapy by IDOi@TBC-Hf. Tumor inhibition curves for treated (b, d) and untreated (c, e) tumors of CT26 (b, c) or MC38 (d, e) models after PDT treatment. Black and red arrows refer to the time of injection and light irradiation, respectively. Reprinted with permission form ref. [129]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
(a) Schematic figures of drug loading and EPR targeting strategy. (b) pH-responsive outer MOFs for drug release and dual-modal optical- and MRI-guided cancer therapy in vitro and in vivo. (c) MRI T2 images of lung, liver and tumor before, 30 min and 24 h after intravenous injection of d-MOFs. d) Tumor growth curves after treatments. Reprinted with permission of ref. [150]. Copyright 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Schematic fugure of the synthetic strategy for PPy@MIL-100(Fe) as pH/NIR-responsive drug carriers for MRI/PAI dual-modality imaging and PTT/chemo synergistic therapy. Reprinted with permission of ref. [143]. Copyright 2016 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
(a) Fluorescent imaging of tumor-bearing mice before and after intravenous injection of Fe3O4@C@PMOF. The red arrow points to liver region and the yellow arrow points to tumor region. (b) MRI T2 images of tumor-bearing mice. (c) Tumor growth curves after treatment. V0 and V refer to tumor volumes before and after PTT and/or PDT treatment with Fe3O4@C@PMOF. Black and red arrows refer to injection and irradiation time points, respectively. (d) Representative optical images of tumor-bearing mice after treatments. Reprinted with permission of ref. [138]. Copyright 2017 Nature Publishing Group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ackroyd R, Kelty C, Brown N, Reed M. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2001;74:656–669. - PubMed
    1. Pushpan S, Venkatraman S, Anand V, Sankar J, Parmeswaran D, Ganesan S, Chandrashekar T. Current Medicinal Chemistry-Anti-Cancer Agents. 2002;2:187–207. - PubMed
    1. Roelandts R. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2002;46:926–930. - PubMed
    1. Møller KI, Kongshoj B, Philipsen PA, Thomsen VO, Wulf HC. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine. 2005;21:118–124. - PubMed
    1. Patrizi A, Raone B, Ravaioli GM. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology. 2015;8:511. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources