Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;13(3):300-316.
doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1275644. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

2.5-year-olds' retention and generalization of novel words across short and long delays

Affiliations

2.5-year-olds' retention and generalization of novel words across short and long delays

Erica H Wojcik. Lang Learn Dev. 2017.

Abstract

Two experiments investigated two-year-olds' retention and generalization of novel words across short and long time delays. Specifically, retention of newly learned words and generalization to novel exemplars or novel contexts were tested one minute or one week after learning. Experiment 1 revealed successful retention as well as successful generalization to both new exemplars and new contexts after a one-minute delay, with no statistical differences between retention and generalization performance for either generalization type. Toddlers tested after a week delay (Experiment 2) showed successful retention and generalization as well, but while context generalization was statistically equivalent to retention accuracy, exemplar generalization was significantly lower than retention accuracy. The overall success in both retention and generalization suggests that toddlers' newly learned words are robust and flexible. However, the lower exemplar generalization performance compared to retention after a weeklong delay suggests that novel words may become less flexible across exemplar characteristics over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The novel object images presented in the a) Encoding phase b) Exemplar Generalizatoin condition and c) Context Generalization condition.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean proportion of looking to the target image after target word onset in Experiment 1 (learned-words dataset). The dashed horizontal line represented chance performance. The dotted vertical line marks the onset of the critical window (300ms after word onset) used in the analysis. Error bands represent one standard error of the mean.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean proportion of looking to the target image after target word onset in Experiment 2 (learned-words dataset). The dashed horizontal line represented chance performance. The dotted vertical line marks the onset of the critical window (300ms after word onset) used in the analysis. Error bands represent one standard error of the mean.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adelman JS, Brown GD, & Quesada JF (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. .Psychological Science 17(9), 814–823. - PubMed
    1. Barnat SB, Klein PJ, & Meltzoff AN (1996). Deferred imitation across changes in context and object: Memory and generalization in 14-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 19(2), 241–251. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bion RA, Borovsky A, & Fernald A (2013). Fast mapping, slow learning: Disambiguation of novel word–object mappings in relation to vocabulary learning at 18, 24, and 30 months. Cognition,126(1), 39–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Booth AE (2009). Causal supports for early word learning. Child Development, 80(4), 1243–1250. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyce SJ, Pollatsek A, & Rayner K (1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 556. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources