Workplace Bullying of Urology Residents: Implications for the Patient and Provider
- PMID: 30742867
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.062
Workplace Bullying of Urology Residents: Implications for the Patient and Provider
Abstract
Objective: To elucidate whether urology residents in the United States feel bullied by nurses, how respected they feel at work, and whether this impacts personal and patient care.
Methods: We distributed an Institutional Review Board-approved online, validated, revised Negative Acts Questionnaire to US urology residents in their first year or above. We evaluated bullying through scoring work (total range 5-25), person (total range 9-45), and physical intimidation (total range 3-15) related bullying domains. We also solicited how respected residents feel by different staff on a Likert scale and the perceived personal and professional impact of bullying. Bullying domains were assessed with descriptive statistics and mean total bullying scores (MTBS) and demographics compared.
Results: We received 102 responses (82% MD, 18% DO). One resident reported never experiencing bullying. Overall average MTBS was 28.9 ± 0.9 (17-68). 98.0%, 82.4%, and 77.5% of residents reported at least 1 incident of work, person, and physical intimidation-related bullying, respectively. DO residents reported higher MTBS than MD residents (33.7 ± 2.2vs 27.8 ± 1.0, P = .015). Higher MTBS scores were seen in residents who feared retaliation and considered transferring programs, while lower scores were seen where the resident-nurse relationship was nurtured.
Conclusion: Ninety percent of residents perceived some degree of bullying and report a negative impact on personal performance and patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
EDITORIAL COMMENT.Urology. 2019 May;127:34-35. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.063. Urology. 2019. PMID: 31003638 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical