Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 11;12(1):77.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4113-7.

Are circulating microRNAs suitable for the early detection of malignant mesothelioma? Results from a nested case-control study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Are circulating microRNAs suitable for the early detection of malignant mesothelioma? Results from a nested case-control study

Daniel Gilbert Weber et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Objective: Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer of the serous membranes. For the detection of the tumor at early stages non- or minimally-invasive biomarkers are needed. The circulating biomarkers miR-132-3p, miR-126-3p, and miR-103a-3p were analyzed in a nested case-control study using plasma samples from 17 prediagnostic mesothelioma cases and 34 matched asbestos-exposed controls without a malignant disease.

Results: Using prediagnostic plasma samples collected in median 8.9 months prior the clinical diagnosis miR-132-3p, miR-126-3p, and miR-103a-3p revealed 0% sensitivity on a defined specificity of 98%. Thus, the analyzed miRNAs failed to detect the cancer in prediagnostic samples, showing that they are not feasible for the early detection of malignant mesothelioma. However, the miRNAs might still serve as possible markers for prognosis and response to therapy, but this needs to be analyzed in appropriate studies.

Keywords: Biomarker; Blood; Cancer; Liquid biopsies; Marker; Mesothelioma; MicroRNA; Negative results; Null results; Prediagnostic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of miR-132-3p (a), miR-126-3p (b), and miR-103a-3p (c) in prediagnostic mesothelioma cases and asbestos-exposed controls. Mann–Whitney U tests were performed to examine group differences. Horizontal bars represent median and interquartile range
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of miR-132-3p, miR-126-3p, miR-103a-3p, and the combination of the three miRNAs

References

    1. Robinson BM. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an epidemiological perspective. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;1(4):491–496. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hodgson JT, McElvenny DM, Darnton AJ, Price MJ, Peto J. The expected burden of mesothelioma mortality in Great Britain from 2002 to 2050. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(3):587–593. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602307. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zalcman G, Mazieres J, Margery J, Greillier L, Audigier-Valette C, Moro-Sibilot D, Molinier O, Corre R, Monnet I, Gounant V, et al. Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed pleural mesothelioma in the Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study (MAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1405–1414. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01238-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brosseau S, Dhalluin X, Zalcman G, Scherpereel A. Immunotherapy in relapsed mesothelioma. Immunotherapy. 2018;10(2):77–80. doi: 10.2217/imt-2017-0144. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones RG, Karthik F, Dugar A, Kanagarajan K, Desai K, Bhandari M. Nivolumab immunotherapy in malignant mesothelioma: a case report highlighting a new opportunity for exceptional outcomes. Am J Case Rep. 2018;19:783–789. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.909584. - DOI - PMC - PubMed