Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;14(1):107-116.

INTRA- AND INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF THE SELECTIVE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT (SFMA) IN HEALTHY PARTICIPANTS

Affiliations

INTRA- AND INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF THE SELECTIVE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT (SFMA) IN HEALTHY PARTICIPANTS

Justin M Stanek et al. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA) is a popular assessment tool used to observe and detect components of dysfunctional movement patterns. The goal of the assessment is to identify impairments throughout the kinetic chain that may be contributing to movement dysfunction and/or pain.

Hypothesis/purpose: The purpose of this research was to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the 10 top-tier movements of the SFMA using the categorical scoring system. It was hypothesized the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the SFMA would be acceptable with variations based on the objectivity of the scoring criteria and the experience of the rater.

Study design: Cross-sectional reliability study.

Methods: 25 (17 male, 8 female), physically active participants (age: 21.2 ± 1.6years, height: 177.1 ± 10.7cm, weight: 74.9 ± 13.9kg) were independently assessed in real time by three clinicians during two separate visits to the lab using a standard instructional script. Clinicians had varying levels of experience with the SFMA and the two visits occurred a minimum of 48 hours and maximum of seven days apart. Results from each clinician were compared within and between raters using the Kappa coefficient and ratings of absolute agreement.

Results: Overall, slight to substantial intra- and inter-rater reliability were observed using the categorical scoring tool, although variations existed depending on the movement pattern. Kappa coefficients for intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.21-1.00, while % absolute agreement ranged from 0.64-1.00. Inter-rater reliability for the same measures ranged from 0.11-0.89 and 0.52-0.96 respectively. Clinicians certified in the SFMA with the greatest amount of experience using the SFMA demonstrated higher intra-rater reliability. Similarly, higher inter-rater reliability was found between certified raters with the most experience.

Conclusions: Certified SFMA raters with greater amounts of experience can demonstrate adequate intra- and inter-rater reliability using the categorical scoring method.

Level of evidence: 2, Reliability study.

Keywords: Dysfunction; functional movement; movement screen; movement system; repeatability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cervical extension test.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Single leg stance test.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Multisegmental extension test.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Cervical rotation test.

References

    1. Glaws K Juneau C Becker L, et al. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the selective functional movement assessment (SFMA). Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(2):195-207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dolbeer J Mason J Morris J, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the selective funcional movement assessment (SFMA) by SFMA certified physical therapists with similar clinical and rating experience. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017;12(5):752-763. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook G. Movement: Functional movement systems screening-assessment-corrective strategies. Ramsey, NJ: On Target Publications; 2010:311.
    1. SFMA. Selective functional movement assessment seminar manual. . 2011.
    1. Wainner R Whitman J Cleland J, et al. Regional interdependence: A musculoskeletal examination model whose time has come. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(11):658-660. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources