Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 5;4(1):e00265-18.
doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00265-18. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.

Bridging the Holistic-Reductionist Divide in Microbial Ecology

Affiliations

Bridging the Holistic-Reductionist Divide in Microbial Ecology

Robin Tecon et al. mSystems. .

Abstract

Microbial communities are inherently complex systems. To address this complexity, microbial ecologists are developing new, more elaborate laboratory models at an ever-increasing pace. These model microbial communities and habitats have opened up the exploration of new territories that lie between the simplicity and controllability of "synthetic" systems and the convolution and complexity of natural environments. Here, we discuss this classic methodological divide, we propose a conceptual perspective that integrates new research developments, and we sketch a 3-point possible roadmap to cross the divide between controllability and complexity in microbial ecology.

Keywords: metagenomics; microbial communities; microbial diversity; synthetic ecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Dimensions of complexity in microbial communities. (A) We define three interdependent axes of complexity. The first spans genotypic diversity and abundance across all domains of life. The second axis encompasses environmental factors at all scales, including habitat structure, physicochemical gradients, and transport processes. The third axis deals with the system characteristics and its emergent properties, ranging from single biochemical reactions to ecosystem functions. All these elements can vary in space and time. Colored volumes exemplify representative types of microbial communities showing various levels of complexity, ranging from very high in all dimensions (soil microbial community) to very low in all dimensions (3-member consortium in batch culture). Other examples are natural microbial systems that show relatively low levels of complexity (microbial communities in the bee gut and from acid mine drainage) and hence represent intermediate research models. (B) Associated with the complexity dimensions are the levels of control and predictability of the microbial system, which are somewhat proportional to the system’s complexity (the relationship between control and predictability, however, may vary with microbial systems and with the type of predicted processes). Complex systems thus tend to be more amenable to descriptive investigations, while simplified ones tend to be more amenable to explanatory investigations. It is of course informative to study complex as well as simple systems. However, there is a trade-off between realism and interpretive power.

References

    1. Fang FC, Casadevall A. 2011. Reductionistic and holistic science. Infect Immun 79:1401–1404. doi:10.1128/IAI.01343-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raes J, Letunic I, Yamada T, Jensen LJ, Bork P. 2014. Toward molecular trait‐based ecology through integration of biogeochemical, geographical and metagenomic data. Mol Syst Biol 7:473. doi:10.1038/msb.2011.6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zengler K, Palsson BO. 2012. A road map for the development of community systems (CoSy) biology. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:366–372. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2763. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fredrickson JK. 2015. Ecological communities by design. Science 348:1425–1427. doi:10.1126/science.aab0946. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johns NI, Blazejewski T, Gomes ALC, Wang HH. 2016. Principles for designing synthetic microbial communities. Curr Opin Microbiol 31:146–153. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2016.03.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources