Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
- PMID: 30746634
- PMCID: PMC6533215
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05137-8
Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). In addition, factors influencing breast sensibility were evaluated.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in Maastricht University Medical Center between July 2016 and August 2018. Women with unilateral mastectomy with or without IBBR were included. Objective sensory measurements were performed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Their healthy breast served as control, using a paired t test. Differences between mastectomy with and without IBBR were evaluated using the independent t test. Linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between patient characteristics on breast sensibility. The paired t test was used to evaluate in which part of the breast the sensibility is best preserved.
Results: Fifty-one patients were eligible for inclusion. Sixteen patients underwent IBBR after mastectomy. Twenty-three patients received radiotherapy and 35 patients received chemotherapy. Monofilament values were significantly higher in the operated group compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). Linear regression showed a statistically significant association between IBBR and objectively measured impaired sensation (p = 0.008). After mastectomy, the cutaneous protective sensation is only diminished. After IBBR, it is lost in the majority of the breast. The medial part of the breast was significantly more sensitive than the lateral part in all operated breasts (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: IBBR has a significantly negative impact on the breast sensibility compared to mastectomy alone. This study shows that the protective sensation of the skin in the breast is lost after IBBR. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or IBBR. More research is necessary to confirm these results.
Keywords: Alloplastic breast reconstruction; Breast cancer; Implant-based breast reconstruction; Mastectomy; Sensibility.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The influence of a previous implant-based breast reconstruction on postoperative sensation of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap.Breast Cancer. 2024 May;31(3):456-466. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01558-6. Epub 2024 Apr 6. Breast Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38580855 Free PMC article.
-
[Current practice of implant-based breast reconstruction: results from China national practice questionnaire survey].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 1;57(8):616-621. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.08.010. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31422632 Chinese.
-
Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):251-258. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30668-4. Epub 2016 Dec 22. Lancet Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28012977 Clinical Trial.
-
Does postoperative radiation therapy represent a contraindication to expander-implant based immediate breast reconstruction? An update 2012-2014.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Jun;19(12):2202-7. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26166643 Review.
-
Breast reconstruction after mastectomy.Coll Antropol. 2010 Mar;34 Suppl 1:113-23. Coll Antropol. 2010. PMID: 20402306 Review.
Cited by
-
Solar Burns to the Reconstructed Breast: A Rare Complication following Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):e4222. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004222. eCollection 2022 May. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022. PMID: 35702537 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Breast Skin/Nipple-Areolar Complex Sensation and Quality of Life after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Followed by Reconstruction.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 9;60(10):1655. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101655. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39459441 Free PMC article.
-
Careful Where You Cut: Strategies for Successful Nerve-preserving Mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 May 15;12(5):e5817. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005817. eCollection 2024 May. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 38752216 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of Objective Sensory Outcomes From 764 Breasts Shows Superior Sensation of Autologous Reconstruction With Neurotization.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 May 6;13(5):e6751. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006751. eCollection 2025 May. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025. PMID: 40330161 Free PMC article.
-
Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes following Innervated Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Sep 28;10(9):e4559. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004559. eCollection 2022 Sep. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022. PMID: 36187284 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Schreuder K, van Bommel ACM, de Ligt KM, Maduro JH, Vrancken Peeters M, Mureau MAM, Siesling S. Hospital organizational factors affect the use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in the Netherlands. Breast. 2017;34:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.011. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (DICA). Jaarrapportage 2017 - Registraties.
-
- von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical