Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study
- PMID: 30747025
- DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1534090
Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study
Abstract
Prostaglandins and intracervical catheters are similarly effective for cervical ripening and for an induction of labour (IOL). Studies comparing the combined use with either method alone have administered repetitive doses of prostaglandins vaginally, which may increase the risk of tachysystole and chorioamnionitis. These disadvantages may be offset by co-administering a single dose of prostaglandin. Women (n = 110) planned for IOL, ≥37 weeks of gestation and with a Bishop Score of ≤6 were randomised into two groups: intracervical Foley catheter alone or combined with dinoprostone gel (0.5 mg) for 12 hours followed by oxytocin. The primary outcome was the IDI and the others were: change in Bishop Score, caesarean section (CS) requirement, any complications and neonatal outcome. The baseline Bishop was ≤4 in all and >80% were nulliparous. The post-ripening Bishop was significantly higher (6.67 vs. 5.98; p = .045) and the IDI was significantly lower in the combined group (16 hours and 16 minutes vs. 20 hours 44 minutes, p = .002). The CS rate was similar (29.1 vs. 25.5%; p = .669). No woman had hyperstimulation or chorioamnionitis and the neonatal outcomes were similar. Thus, co-administering one dose of an intracervical PGE2 gel with Foley was superior to Foley alone for cervical ripening and IOL. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Prostaglandins and intracervical balloon catheters used individually are similarly effective for ripening an unfavourable cervix prior to the induction of labour (IOL). A few studies which have compared their found it to result in a shorter cervical ripening time and induction delivery interval (IDI) as compared to prostaglandins alone, though chorioamnionitis was a concern. When compared to balloon catheter used alone, combined use was either similarly or more effective. The studies comparing combined use with either method used alone have administered repetitive doses of prostaglandins vaginally, which may increase the risk of tachysystole, and possibly of chorioamnionitis. Co-administering a single dose of prostaglandin with a balloon catheter may offset these disadvantages. What do the results of this study add? A combined method for cervical ripening using a single dose of intracervical dinoprostone gel (PGE2, 0.5 mg) coadministered with an intracervical Foley catheter was superior to Foley catheter alone. The combined method improved the Bishop score after 12 hours and reduced the IDI significantly compared to the Foley catheter alone; while the caesarean rate and neonatal outcomes were similar. No woman had chorioamnionits or hyperstimulation. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The combined methods for cervical ripening should be compared to individual methods in more women, and the combinations may explore the use of other single use prostaglandins like the dinoprostone vaginal insert or misoprostol tablets.
Keywords: Cervical; Foley’s; dinoprostone; intracervical; ripening.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Feb;42(2):232-238. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1904227. Epub 2021 May 24. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 34027782 Clinical Trial.
-
Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):743.e1-743.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32387325
-
Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Apr;84(4):362-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00662.x. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005. PMID: 15762966 Clinical Trial.
-
Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013251. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30508911 Free PMC article.
-
Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 11;17(6):1825. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061825. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32168947 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of pre and post Foley catheter Bishop's Score: A retrospective record review at Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, Pakistan.Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(1Part-I):73-77. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.1.7433. Pak J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38196485 Free PMC article.
-
The infection, cervical and perineal lacerations in relation to postpartum hemorrhage following vaginal delivery induced by Cook balloon catheter.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jan;309(1):159-166. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06861-1. Epub 2023 Jan 6. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 36607435
-
Intra-cervical Foley Balloon Catheter Versus Prostaglandins for the Induction of Labour: A Literature Review.Cureus. 2023 Jan 17;15(1):e33855. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33855. eCollection 2023 Jan. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36819352 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources