Does Experienced Discrimination Explain Patterns of Menthol Use Among Young Adults? Evidence from the 2014 San Francisco Bay Area Young Adult Health Survey
- PMID: 30747029
- PMCID: PMC6483851
- DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1560468
Does Experienced Discrimination Explain Patterns of Menthol Use Among Young Adults? Evidence from the 2014 San Francisco Bay Area Young Adult Health Survey
Abstract
Background: Young adults are at high risk for using flavored tobacco, including menthol and underrepresented populations, such as Latino and African American young adults, are at particular risk.
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to identify sociodemographic correlates of menthol use among young adult smokers and examine the potential role of experienced discrimination in explaining any associations.
Methods: We conducted a probabilistic multimode household survey of young adults (aged 18-26) residing in Alameda and San Francisco Counties in California in 2014 (n = 1,350). We used logistic regression to evaluate associations between menthol cigarette use and experienced discrimination among young adult smokers as well as with respect to sociodemographic, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors. Interactions between experienced discrimination and race/ethnicity, sex and LGB identity were also modeled.
Results: Latino and non-Hispanic Black young adult smokers were more likely to report current menthol use than non-Hispanic Whites, while those with college education were less likely to do so. Experienced discrimination mediated the relationship between race and menthol use for Asian/Pacific Islander and Multiracial young adult smokers with odds of use increasing by 32 and 42% respectively for each additional unit on the experienced discrimination scale. Conclusions/Importance: Latino and African American young adult smokers have disproportionately high menthol use rates; however, discrimination only predicted higher use for Asian/Pacific Islander and Multiracial young adult smokers. Limits on the sale of menthol cigarettes may benefit all nonwhite race/ethnic groups as well as those with less education.
Keywords: Flavored tobacco; health disparities; smoking; tobacco control.
Conflict of interest statement
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures



References
-
- Center for Tobacco Products. General Questions and Answers on the Ban of Cigarettes that Contain Certain Characterizing Flavors. Washington D.C.: Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;2009.
-
- Mitka M FDA exercises new authority to regulate tobacco products, but some limits remain. JAMA. 2009;302(19):2078–2081. - PubMed
-
- Tobacco Control Section. California Flavored Tobacco and Menthol Cigarette Policy Matrix. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services;2017.
-
- WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation. Banning Menthol in Tobacco Products. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;2016.