Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;33(12):3970-3975.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06685-2. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

Endoscopic vacuum assisted wound closure (EVAC) device to treat esophageal and gastric leaks: assessing time to proficiency and cost

Marc A Ward  1   2 , Tareq Hassan  1 , James S Burdick  3 , Steven G Leeds  4   5   6
Affiliations

Endoscopic vacuum assisted wound closure (EVAC) device to treat esophageal and gastric leaks: assessing time to proficiency and cost

Marc A Ward et al. Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVAC) is an emerging procedure used to treat anastomotic leaks and/or perforations that would otherwise require surgery. The aim of this study was to determine time to proficiency in EVAC and the cost effectiveness of the procedure.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained IRB approved database for all patients undergoing EVAC after esophageal and gastric complications between October 2013 and December 2017. Proficiency was determined by obtaining predicted estimates and analyzing the point at which average procedure time plateaued based on case volume. Total cost was calculated based on supplies and location where the procedure was performed.

Results: There were 50 patients (17 males, 33 female), with a mean age of 52.1 years. EVAC was placed in 23 (46%) patients with esophageal injuries and 28 (56%) with gastric injuries. Two advanced endoscopists performed all EVAC procedures in this study (1 surgeon, 1 gastroenterologist). The average procedure time for all patients was 43.5 min and the average wheel in/wheel out time for all patients was 75.6 min. Analysis of the trend based on average procedure times for EVAC revealed that proficiency was obtained after 10 cases. Total cost of the procedure is significantly lower in the GI lab compared to the operating room ($4528 vs. $11889). The majority of EVAC were performed in the GI lab (62%) compared to the operating room (38%).

Conclusion: Successful outcomes in managing anastomotic leaks or intestinal perforations non-operatively has led to an increased interest in EVAC. For advanced endoscopists, time to proficiency is approximately 10 cases. Performing the procedure in the GI lab has a 2.5 reduction in total cost compared to the operating room.

Keywords: Anastomotic leak; Cost utilization; Endoscopic vacuum assisted closure; Intra-abdominal perforation; Proficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3349-3356 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):708-11 - PubMed
    1. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):33-40 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3883-90 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1906-1914 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources