Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr:53:100737.
doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 10.

Comparing vasopressin and oxytocin fiber and receptor density patterns in the social behavior neural network: Implications for cross-system signaling

Affiliations
Review

Comparing vasopressin and oxytocin fiber and receptor density patterns in the social behavior neural network: Implications for cross-system signaling

Caroline J W Smith et al. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OXT) regulate social behavior by binding to their canonical receptors, the vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) and oxytocin receptor (OTR), respectively. Recent studies suggest that these neuropeptides may also signal via each other's receptors. The extent to which such cross-system signaling occurs likely depends on anatomical overlap between AVP/OXT fibers and V1aR/OTR expression. By comparing AVP/OXT fiber densities with V1aR/OTR binding densities throughout the rat social behavior neural network (SBNN), we propose the potential for cross-system signaling in four regions: the medial amygdala (MeA), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNSTp), medial preoptic area, and periaqueductal grey. We also discuss possible implications of corresponding sex (higher in males versus females) and age (higher in adults versus juveniles) differences in AVP fiber and OTR binding densities in the MeA and BNSTp. Overall, this review reveals the need to unravel the consequences of potential cross-system signaling between AVP and OXT systems in the SBNN for the regulation of social behavior.

Keywords: Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; Cross-talk; Medial amygdala; Medial preoptic area; Oxytocin; Oxytocin receptor; Periaqueductal grey; Social behavior; V1a receptor; Vasopressin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Representative images of AVP-ir fibers, OXT-ir fibers, V1aR binding, and OTR binding in the regions of the adult male rat SBNN. Dashed outlines indicate region boundaries. Bregma distances are based on the Paxinos and Watson Rat Brain Atlas (2007).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overview of sex and age differences in AVP-ir and OXT-ir cells/fiber density (measured as cell number/pixels: DiBenedictis et al., 2017) and in OTR and V1aR binding density (measured as disintegrations per minute/milligram tissue: Smith et al., 2017) in nodes of the rat SBNN. Significant main effects of sex (M = males, F = females) and of age (J = juveniles, A = adults) are indicate with the symbol >. Significant sex*age interaction effects are denoted by the inclusion of the appropriate sex + age. Green boxes represent cortico-striatal regions; blue boxes represent hypothalamic regions; red box represents midbrain region.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Robust male-biased sex differences in OTR and more limited female-biased sex differences in V1aR. (A) OTR binding density in the MeP is higher in males than in females and higher in adult males than in juvenile males (Smith et al., 2017). (B) V1aR binding density in the MeP is higher in females than in males (Sex effect: F(1,43) = 13.4, p<0.001), in both juveniles and adults (Age effect: F(1,43) = 0.31, p=0.58; Interaction effect: F(1,43) = 0.06, p=0.80). (C) OTR binding density in the BNSTp is higher in males than in females and higher in adults than in juveniles (Smith et al., 2017). (D) V1aR binding density in the BNSTp does not differ with sex or age (Sex effect: F(1,41) = 1.70, p=0.20; Age effect: F(1,41) = 0.20, p=0.66; Interaction effect: F(1,41) = 0.37, p=0.55). (E) Cohen’s D effect sizes for significant sex differences. Data presented in B and D was conducted according to Smith et al. (2017). *p<0.05, #p<0.05 versus respective juvenile group, 2-way ANOVA, values indicate means (disintegrations per minute /milligram tissue) + SEM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albers HE, Pollock J, Simmons WH, Ferris CF (1986) A V1-like receptor mediates vasopressin-induced flank marking behavior in hamster hypothalamus, J Neurosci. 6(7): 2085–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albers HE, Rowland CM, Ferris CF (1991) Arginine-vasopressin immunoreactivity is not altered by photoperiod or gonadal hormones in the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Brain Research. 539(1): 137–42. - PubMed
    1. Albers HE (2015) Species, sex and individual differences in the vasotocin/vasopressin system: relationship to neurochemical signaling in the social behavior neural network, Front Neuroendocrinol. 36:49–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anacker AM, Christensen JD, LaFlamme EM, Grunberg DM, Beery AK (2016) Septal oxytocin administration impairs peer affiliation via V1a receptors in female meadow voles, Psychoneuroendocrinology. 68:156–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arakawa H, Arakawa K, Deak T (2010) Oxytocin and vasopressin in the medial amygdala differentially modulate approach and avoidance behavior toward illness-related social odor, Neuroscience. 171(4):1141–51. - PubMed

Publication types