Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Feb 19;8(4):e010932.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010932.

Relationship Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Lipoprotein(a) Lowering in Response to PCSK9 Inhibition With Evolocumab

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Relationship Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Lipoprotein(a) Lowering in Response to PCSK9 Inhibition With Evolocumab

Michael D Shapiro et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Beyond their potent LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol ( LDL -C)-lowering efficacy (50-60%), PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitors also reduce Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) levels by 25% to 30%, suggesting a 2:1 response ratio. We aimed to characterize the relationship between LDL -C and Lp(a) lowering by evolocumab, a PCSK 9 inhibitor, in a large clinical trial population and to determine the prevalence of concordant/discordant LDL -C and Lp(a) responses to PCSK 9 inhibition. Methods and Results Data were analyzed from 4 randomized, 12-week, multicenter, phase 3 evolocumab trials. Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia, or statin intolerance participated in the trials. The main measure was the degree of concordance or discordance of LDL -C and Lp(a) in response to PCSK 9 inhibition; concordant response was defined as LDL -C reduction >35% and Lp(a) reduction >10%. The study cohort comprised 895 patients (438 female; median age: 59.0 years [interquartile range: 51-66 years]). Baseline mean level of LDL -C was 133.6 mg/dL (SE: 1.7) and median Lp(a) level was 46.4 mg/dL (interquartile range: 18.4-82.4 mg/dL). A discordant response was observed in 165 (19.7%) patients. With these cutoffs, the prevalence of discordance was higher when considering baseline Lp(a) concentrations >30 mg/dL (26.5%) or >50 mg/dL (28.6%). Conclusions We demonstrate high prevalence of discordance in LDL -C and Lp(a) reduction in response to evolocumab, particularly when considering higher baseline Lp(a) concentrations, indicating the possibility of alternative pathways beyond LDLR ( LDL receptor)-mediated clearance involved in Lp(a) reduction by evolocumab. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT 01763827, NCT 01763866, NCT 01763905, NCT 01763918.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01763827 NCT01763866 NCT01763905 NCT01763918.

Keywords: lipid‐lowering therapy; lipoprotein[a]; low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between percentage reduction in LDL‐C and Lp(a). Relationship between percentage reduction in LDL‐C and Lp(a) at 12 weeks of evolocumab therapy according to baseline Lp(a). A, Baseline Lp(a) >10 mg/dL. B, Baseline Lp(a) >30 mg/dL, C, Baseline Lp(a) >50 mg/dL. The quadrants shaded in pink represent patients with discordant LDL‐C and Lp(a) responses to evolocumab based on response to therapy defined as LDL‐C reduction >35% and Lp(a) reduction >10%. LDL‐C indicates low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a); Q2W, every 2 weeks; QM, monthly.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between percentage reduction in Lp(a) and selected variables. Relationship between percentage reduction in Lp(a) and baseline LDL‐C (A), on‐treatment LDL‐C (B), and baseline Lp(a) concentration (C) for the overall cohort at 12 weeks of evolocumab therapy. LDL‐C indicates low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maxwell KN, Breslow JL. Adenoviral‐mediated expression of Pcsk9 in mice results in a low‐density lipoprotein receptor knockout phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:7100–7105. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Wang H, Liu T, Wasserman SM, Sever PS, Pedersen TR; FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators . Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1713–1722. - PubMed
    1. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, Edelberg JM, Goodman SG, Hanotin C, Harrington RA, Jukema JW, Lecorps G, Mahaffey KW, Moryusef A, Pordy R, Quintero K, Roe MT, Sasiela WJ, Tamby JF, Tricoci P, White HD, Zeiher AM; Committees OO, Investigators . Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2097–2107. - PubMed
    1. Koren MJ, Lundqvist P, Bolognese M, Neutel JM, Monsalvo ML, Yang J, Kim JB, Scott R, Wasserman SM, Bays H; MENDEL‐2 Investigators . Anti‐PCSK9 monotherapy for hypercholesterolemia: the MENDEL‐2 randomized, controlled phase III clinical trial of evolocumab. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2531–2540. - PubMed
    1. Raal FJ, Stein EA, Dufour R, Turner T, Civeira F, Burgess L, Langslet G, Scott R, Olsson AG, Sullivan D, Hovingh GK, Cariou B, Gouni‐Berthold I, Somaratne R, Bridges I, Scott R, Wasserman SM, Gaudet D; RUTHERFORD‐2 Investigators . PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab (AMG 145) in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (RUTHERFORD‐2): a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:331–340. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data