Can Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Be Safely Placed in Patients with Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy? A Retrospective Study of Almost 400,000 Catheter-Days
- PMID: 30755503
- PMCID: PMC6738314
- DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0281
Can Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Be Safely Placed in Patients with Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy? A Retrospective Study of Almost 400,000 Catheter-Days
Abstract
Background: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are central venous catheters (CVCs) that are commonly used in onco-hematologic settings for chemotherapy administration. As there is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific CVC for chemotherapy administration, we aimed to ascertain PICC-related adverse events (AEs) and identify independent predictors of PICC removal in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Materials and methods: Information on adult patients with cancer with a PICC inserted for chemotherapy administration between September 2007 and December 2014 was extracted from six hospital databases. The primary outcome was PICC removal due to PICC-related AEs (occlusion, infection, or symptomatic thrombosis). Independent predictors of PICC removal were identified using a multivariate Cox regression model.
Results: Among the 2,477 included patients, 419 PICC-related AEs (16.9%; 1.09 AEs per 1,000 PICC-days) were reported. AEs increased when PICC was inserted at the brachial site (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.84) and with open systems (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.24-2.88) and decreased in older men (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81).
Conclusion: Use of PICC for chemotherapy administration was associated with a low all-AEs rate. The basilic vein was the safer site, and valved systems had fewer AEs than open systems. More research is needed to explore the interaction between AEs, sex, and age.
Implications for practice: These findings provide clinicians with evidence that peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are safe for chemotherapy administration. They also suggest that clinicians should limit the use of open systems when long chemotherapy regimens are scheduled. Moreover, alternatives to PICCs should be considered when administering chemotherapy to young men.
Keywords: Complications; Hematologic neoplasms; Medical oncology; Patient safety; Peripheral catheterization; Vascular access devices.
© AlphaMed Press 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.
Similar articles
-
A six-year study of complications related to peripherally inserted central catheters: A multi-center retrospective cohort study in China.Perfusion. 2023 May;38(4):689-697. doi: 10.1177/02676591221076287. Epub 2022 Mar 2. Perfusion. 2023. PMID: 35236188
-
A retrospective study of the safety of over 100,000 peripherally-inserted central catheters days for parenteral supportive treatments.Res Nurs Health. 2019 Jun;42(3):198-204. doi: 10.1002/nur.21939. Epub 2019 Mar 25. Res Nurs Health. 2019. PMID: 30912181
-
Comparison of outcomes of central venous catheters in patients with solid and hematologic neoplasms: an Italian real-world analysis.Tumori. 2021 Feb;107(1):17-25. doi: 10.1177/0300891620931172. Epub 2020 Jun 12. Tumori. 2021. PMID: 32529962
-
Outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheter vs conventional central venous catheters in hematological cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hematology. 2025 Dec;30(1):2450572. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2025.2450572. Epub 2025 Jan 14. Hematology. 2025. PMID: 39809588
-
Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients.Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):489-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.489. Chest. 2005. PMID: 16100130 Review.
Cited by
-
Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12099-8. BMC Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38641574 Free PMC article.
-
The incidence of asymptomatic thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheter in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis People's.Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2249-2261. doi: 10.1002/nop2.811. Epub 2021 Feb 22. Nurs Open. 2021. PMID: 33617142 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of risk factors of PICC-related bloodstream infection in newborns: implications for nursing care.Eur J Med Res. 2021 Jul 23;26(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00546-2. Eur J Med Res. 2021. PMID: 34301331 Free PMC article.
-
Catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with multiple insertions of the peripherally inserted central catheter in patients with hematological disorders.Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 9;11(1):12209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91749-4. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34108612 Free PMC article.
-
Central catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis in cancer: clinical course, prophylaxis, treatment.BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Dec;11(4):371-380. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002106. Epub 2021 Aug 19. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021. PMID: 34413028 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Royal College of Nursing. Standards for infusion therapy. Available at https://www.rcn.org.uk/‐/media/royal‐college‐of‐nursing/documents/public.... Accessed March 9, 2018. - PubMed
-
- Pagnutti L, Bin A, Donato R et al. Difficult intravenous access tool in patients receiving peripheral chemotherapy: A pilot‐validation study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2016;20:58–63. - PubMed
-
- Gallieni M, Pittiruti M, Biffi R. Vascular access in oncology patients. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:323–346. - PubMed
-
- Schiffer CA, Mangu PB, Wade JC et al. Central venous catheter care for the patient with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:1357–1370. - PubMed
-
- Viart H, Combe C, Martinelli T et al. Comparison between implantation costs of peripherally inserted central catheter and implanted subcutaneous ports [in French]. Ann Pharm Fr 2015;73:239–244. - PubMed