Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;32(4):605-617.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00182-7.

Breast Cancer Classification from Histopathological Images with Inception Recurrent Residual Convolutional Neural Network

Affiliations

Breast Cancer Classification from Histopathological Images with Inception Recurrent Residual Convolutional Neural Network

Md Zahangir Alom et al. J Digit Imaging. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

The Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) is one of the most powerful and successful deep learning approaches. DCNNs have already provided superior performance in different modalities of medical imaging including breast cancer classification, segmentation, and detection. Breast cancer is one of the most common and dangerous cancers impacting women worldwide. In this paper, we have proposed a method for breast cancer classification with the Inception Recurrent Residual Convolutional Neural Network (IRRCNN) model. The IRRCNN is a powerful DCNN model that combines the strength of the Inception Network (Inception-v4), the Residual Network (ResNet), and the Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN). The IRRCNN shows superior performance against equivalent Inception Networks, Residual Networks, and RCNNs for object recognition tasks. In this paper, the IRRCNN approach is applied for breast cancer classification on two publicly available datasets including BreakHis and Breast Cancer (BC) classification challenge 2015. The experimental results are compared against the existing machine learning and deep learning-based approaches with respect to image-based, patch-based, image-level, and patient-level classification. The IRRCNN model provides superior classification performance in terms of sensitivity, area under the curve (AUC), the ROC curve, and global accuracy compared to existing approaches for both datasets.

Keywords: Breast cancer recognition; Computational pathology; DCNN; Deep learning; IRRCNN; Medical imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Implementation diagram for breast cancer recognition using the IRRCNN model. The upper part of this figure shows the steps that are used for training the system, and the lower part of this figure displays the testing phase where the trained model is used. These results are evaluated with a number of different performance metrics
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagrams displaying the inception recurrent residual unit (IRRU) consisting of the inception unit and recurrent convolutional layers that are merged by concatenation, and the residual units (summation of the input features with the outputs of the inception unit can be seen just before the output block)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The first row shows the four types of benign tumors, and the second row shows the malignant tumors. The magnification factor of these images is ×400
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sample images of four types of breast cancer (normal, benign, in situ carcinoma, and invasive carcinoma) from the 2015 BC Classification Challenge dataset
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Four example images with corresponding augmented images. The actual images are shown on the left, and four augmented samples (of the 20 created for each image) are shown on the right
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Center patch and resized images from an original sample (left) and from an augmented sample (right)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Training and validation accuracy for BC classification with 8 classes for the IRRCNN model at different magnification factors
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
ROC curve with AUC for different magnification factors for eight class BC classification
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Training and validation accuracy for the multi-class case using the 2015 BC Classification Challenge dataset. Sample sets are resized and augmented (RZ + AUG), center patch cropped and augmented (CRP + AUG), random patches (RP), sample resized (RZ), or center patch cropped (CRP)

References

    1. Loukas C, Kostopoulos S, Tanoglidi A, Glotsos D, Sfikas C, Cavouras D: Breast cancer characterization based on image classification of tissue sections visualized under low magnification. Computational and mathematical methods in medicine 2013 2013 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 1991;19(5):403–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb00229.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gurcan MN, Boucheron LE, Can A, Madabhushi A, Rajpoot NM, Yener B. Histopathological image analysis: a review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;2:147–171. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2009.2034865. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCann MT, Ozolek JA, Castro CA, Parvin B, Kovacevic J. Automated histology analysis: opportunities for signal processing. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2015;32(1):78–87. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2014.2346443. - DOI
    1. Peikari M, Gangeh MJ, Zubovits J, Clarke G, Martel AL. Triaging diagnostically relevant regions from pathology whole slides of breast cancer: a texture based approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35(1):307–315. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2470529. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms