Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Apr;28(4):830-838.
doi: 10.1002/pon.5029. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

Reasons for low uptake of a psychological intervention offered to cancer survivors with elevated depressive symptoms

Affiliations
Observational Study

Reasons for low uptake of a psychological intervention offered to cancer survivors with elevated depressive symptoms

Loek J van der Donk et al. Psychooncology. 2019 Apr.

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Psychooncology. 2019 Sep;28(9):1942. doi: 10.1002/pon.5184. Epub 2019 Jul 30. Psychooncology. 2019. PMID: 31489758 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Objective: In line with screening guidelines, cancer survivors were consecutively screened on depressive symptoms (as part of standard care), with those reporting elevated levels of symptoms offered psychological care as part of a trial. Because of the low uptake, no conclusions could be drawn about the interventions' efficacy. Given the trial set-up (following screening guidelines and strict methodological quality criteria), we believe that this observational study reporting the flow of participation, reasons for and characteristics associated with nonparticipation, adds to the debate about the feasibility and efficiency of screening guidelines.

Methods: Two thousand six hundred eight medium- to long-term cancer survivors were consecutively screened on depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Those with moderate depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) were contacted and informed about the trial. Patient flow and reasons for nonparticipation were carefully monitored.

Results: One thousand thirty seven survivors (74.3%) returned the questionnaire, with 147 (7.6%) reporting moderate depressive symptoms. Of this group, 49 survivors (33.3%) were ineligible, including 26 survivors (17.7%) already receiving treatment and another 44 survivors (30.0%) reporting no need for treatment. Only 25 survivors (1.0%) participated in the trial.

Conclusion: Of the approached survivors for screening, only 1% was eligible and interested in receiving psychological care as part of our trial. Four reasons for nonparticipation were: nonresponse to screening, low levels of depressive symptoms, no need, or already receiving care. Our findings question whether to spend the limited resources in psycho-oncological care on following screening guidelines and the efficiency of using consecutive screening for trial recruitment in cancer survivors.

Keywords: CONSORT; cancer; cancer survivors; consecutive screening; depression; oncology; randomized controlled trial; recruitment; screening; screening guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of participant recruitment and flow through the study. PHQ, patient health questionnaire; CBT, cognitive behavioral therapy; MBCT, mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy; TAU, treatment as usual

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Krebber AMH, Buffart LM, Kleijn G, et al. Prevalence of depression in cancer patients: a meta‐analysis of diagnostic interviews and self‐report instruments. Psychooncology. 2014;23(2):121‐130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bower JE. Behavioral symptoms in patients with breast cancer and survivors. J Clin Oncol [Internet. 2008;26(5):768‐777. Available from: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.3248 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galway K, Black A, Cantwell M, Cr C, Mills M, Donnelly M. Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and emotional wellbeing for recently diagnosed cancer patients. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2012;(11):CD007064. 10.1002/14651858.CD007064.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faller H, Schuler M, Richard M, Heckl U, Weis J, Ku R. Effects of psycho‐oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;31(6):782‐793. - PubMed
    1. Jacobsen PB, Jim HS. Psychosocial interventions for anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients: achievements and challenges. CA ‐ A Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(4):214‐230. - PubMed

Publication types