Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;21(12):1333-1348.
doi: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1562092. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

Scarcity mindset in reproductive health decision making: a qualitative study from rural Malawi

Affiliations

Scarcity mindset in reproductive health decision making: a qualitative study from rural Malawi

Alison H Norris et al. Cult Health Sex. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Poverty has widespread impacts on health. In dealing with resource scarcity, individuals' thoughts are narrowed to address immediate resource limitations, thus crowding out other information, a phenomenon called the scarcity mindset. To assess for indication of a scarcity mindset in sexual and reproductive decision making in rural Malawi, a setting with extreme resource scarcity, we collected qualitative data in the form of eight focus group discussions and 28 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with women and men of varying ages and marital status. Participants, who were of low socioeconomic status, described constant tradeoffs that they made to secure their daily needs. They articulated both the challenges of supporting many children and the need to bear many children to guarantee their own future support. While participants described wealthy people as being concerned with preserving resources (often through the practice of limiting childbearing), they described poor people as working to increase their probability of success against an uncertain economic future (without due consideration of contraceptive behaviours). We found qualitative evidence that a scarcity mindset may influence reproductive decision making among women and men in rural Malawi and may preclude the use of contraception in low-resource settings.

Keywords: Africa; Malawi; Scarcity theory; decision making; reproductive health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Statement

None of the authors have conflicts of interest, including any financial and/or personal relationship that could have the potential to influence the study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adebowale S, Adedini S, Ibisomi L, and Palamuleni M. 2014. “Differential Effect of Wealth Quintile on Modern Contraceptive Use and Fertility: Evidence from Malawian Women.” BMC Women’s Health 14 (1): 1–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashton L, Giridhar N, Holcombe S, Madon T, and Turner E. 2015. “A Review of Behavioral Economics in Reproductive Health.” Behavioral Economics in Reproductive Health Initiative, Center for Effective Global Action. University of California: Berkley, CA.
    1. Bishai D 2002. “Fertility and Wealth in Sri Lanka: Are Children Normal Goods?” Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 20 (2): 99–101. - PubMed
    1. Bledsoe C, Banja F, and Hill A. 1998. “Reproductive Mishaps and Western Contraception: An African Challenge to Fertility Theory.” Population and Development Review 24 (1): 15–57.
    1. Bongaarts J, and Casterline J. 2013. “Fertility Transition: Is Sub-Saharan Africa Different?” Population and Development Review 38 (1): 153–168. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources