Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;5(1):e5.
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.75.

Anxiety scales used in pregnancy: systematic review

Affiliations

Anxiety scales used in pregnancy: systematic review

Andrea Sinesi et al. BJPsych Open. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Anxiety disorders and self-reported symptoms are highly prevalent in pregnancy. Despite their negative impact on maternal and child outcomes, uncertainty remains regarding which symptoms can be considered accurate indicators of antenatal anxiety.AimsTo examine and synthesise the evidence in relation to the psychometric properties and content of self-report scales used to detect anxiety symptoms in pregnant women.

Method: A systematic search was carried out and the methodological quality of all included studies was assessed. Only those achieving a rating of good or excellent were considered in a synthesis of the best available evidence.

Results: Several anxiety symptoms and domains were identified as promising for screening for general antenatal anxiety and pregnancy-related anxiety, including elevated levels of worry, symptoms of panic, fear of childbirth and excessive worries about the baby's health.

Conclusions: This review contributes to the existing knowledge by identifying a number of anxiety symptoms that can be considered psychometrically robust indicators of antenatal anxiety.Declaration of interestNone.

Keywords: Pregnancy; anxiety disorders; pregnancy-specific anxiety; psychometric properties; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the selection process (based on Moher et al).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2017; 210: 315–23. - PubMed
    1. Heron J, O'Connor TG, Evans J, Golding J, Glover V. The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. J Affect Disord 2004; 80: 65–73. - PubMed
    1. Dunkel-Schetter C, Lobel M. Pregnancy and birth: a multilevel analysis of stress and birth weight In Handbook of Health Psychology 2 (eds Revenson T, Baum A, Singer J): 427–53. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2011.
    1. Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, Rapa E, Rahman A, McCallum M, et al. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet 2014; 384: 1800–19. - PubMed
    1. Rubertsson C, Hellström J, Cross M, Sydsjö G. Anxiety in early pregnancy: prevalence and contributing factors. Arch Womens Ment Health 2014; 17: 221–8. - PubMed