Days' Supply of Initial Opioid Analgesic Prescriptions and Additional Fills for Acute Pain Conditions Treated in the Primary Care Setting - United States, 2014
- PMID: 30763301
- PMCID: PMC6375655
- DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6806a3
Days' Supply of Initial Opioid Analgesic Prescriptions and Additional Fills for Acute Pain Conditions Treated in the Primary Care Setting - United States, 2014
Abstract
During 2017, opioids were associated with 47,600 deaths in the United States, approximately one third of which involved a prescription opioid (1). Amid concerns that overprescribing to patients with acute pain remains an essential factor underlying misuse, abuse, diversion, and unintentional overdose, several states have restricted opioid analgesic prescribing (2,3). To characterize patterns of opioid analgesic use for acute pain in primary care settings before the widespread implementation of limits on opioid prescribing (2,3), patients filling an opioid analgesic prescription for acute pain were identified from a 2014 database of commercial claims. Using a logistic generalized additive model, the probability of obtaining a refill was estimated as a function of the initial number of days supplied. Among 176,607 patients with a primary care visit associated with an acute pain complaint, 7.6% filled an opioid analgesic prescription. Among patients who received an initial 7-day supply, the probability of obtaining an opioid analgesic prescription refill for nine of 10 conditions was <25%. These results suggest that a ≤7-day opioid analgesic prescription might be sufficient for most, but not all, patients seen in primary care settings with acute pain who appear to need opioid analgesics. However, treatment strategies should account for patient and condition characteristics, which might alternatively reduce or extend the anticipated duration of benefit from opioid analgesic therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Brian Bateman reports grants from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) during the conduct of the study; grants to Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) from the National Institutes of Health, Pfizer, GSK, Baxalta, Lilly, and Pacira, and personal fees from Aetion, outside the submitted work. Elisabetta Patorno reports a career development grant K08AG055670 from the National Institute on Aging. She is investigator of investigator-initiated grants to BWH from Boehringer Ingelheim and GSK, outside the topic of the submitted work. Jessica Franklin reports grants from FDA during the conduct of the study. Joshua Gagne reports grants from Eli Lilly and Company and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation to BWH and is a consultant to Aetion, Inc. and Optum, Inc., for work unrelated to the study. Krista Huybrechts reports grants from FDA during the conduct of the study and grants to BWH from Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Similar articles
-
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015. PMID: 26469747
-
Patterns of opioid initiation at first visits for pain in United States primary care settings.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 May;27(5):495-503. doi: 10.1002/pds.4322. Epub 2017 Oct 2. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018. PMID: 28971545 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic use of tramadol after acute pain episode: cohort study.BMJ. 2019 May 14;365:l1849. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1849. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 31088782 Free PMC article.
-
Tamper-resistant opioid formulations in the treatment of acute pain.Adv Ther. 2014 Mar;31(3):264-75. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0099-7. Epub 2014 Feb 14. Adv Ther. 2014. PMID: 24526323 Review.
-
Laws limiting the prescribing or dispensing of opioids for acute pain in the United States: A national systematic legal review.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Nov 3. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019. PMID: 30445274
Cited by
-
CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022 Nov 4;71(3):1-95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022. PMID: 36327391 Free PMC article.
-
Acute pain pathways: protocol for a prospective cohort study.BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 5;12(7):e058782. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058782. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35790333 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Impact of Indiana Public Law 194 on Curbing the Concurrent Opioid Prescribing for Indiana Medicaid Enrollees.Subst Abuse. 2023 Apr 20;17:11782218231168722. doi: 10.1177/11782218231168722. eCollection 2023. Subst Abuse. 2023. PMID: 37124581 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term use of hydrocodone vs. oxycodone in primary care.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107524. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Nov 2. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019. PMID: 31707268 Free PMC article.
-
Updated guidelines for prescribing opioids to treat patients with chronic non-cancer pain in Korea: developed by committee on hospice and palliative care of the Korean Pain Society.Korean J Pain. 2024 Apr 1;37(2):119-131. doi: 10.3344/kjp.24022. Korean J Pain. 2024. PMID: 38557654 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baker-White A. A look at state legislation limiting opioid prescriptions. Arlington, VA: Association of State and Territorial Health Officials; 2017. http://www.astho.org/StatePublicHealth/A-Look-at-State-Legislation-Limit...
-
- American College of Physicians. Opioid prescribing: states aim to limit opioid prescriptions. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians; 2018. https://acpinternist.org/archives/2016/10/laws.htm
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources