Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 6;58(19):6385-6390.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201813960. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

Merging Photochemistry with Electrochemistry: Functional-Group Tolerant Electrochemical Amination of C(sp3 )-H Bonds

Affiliations

Merging Photochemistry with Electrochemistry: Functional-Group Tolerant Electrochemical Amination of C(sp3 )-H Bonds

Fei Wang et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Direct amination of C(sp3 )-H bonds is of broad interest in the realm of C-H functionalization because of the prevalence of nitrogen heterocycles and amines in pharmaceuticals and natural products. Reported here is a combined electrochemical/photochemical method for dehydrogenative C(sp3 )-H/N-H coupling that exhibits good reactivity with both sp2 and sp3 N-H bonds. The results show how use of iodide as an electrochemical mediator, in combination with light-induced cleavage of intermediate N-I bonds, enables the electrochemical process to proceed at low electrode potentials. This approach significantly improves the functional-group compatibility of electrochemical C-H amination, for example, tolerating electron-rich aromatic groups that undergo deleterious side reactions in the presence of high electrode potentials.

Keywords: C−H functionalization; amination; electrochemistry; iodine; photochemistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Electrochemical strategies for dehydrogenative amination of sp3 C–H bonds (A) and the associated anodic potentials required for each approach (B). ET = electron transfer, PT = proton transfer, PCET = proton-coupled electron transfer.
Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.
Comparison of previous electrochemical methods for sp3 C–H amination. For detail procedures, see refs. – and Supporting Information. Yields were determined by 1H NMR with m-xylene as internal standard, conversion is shown in parenthesis. [a] Conditions: 1a or 1b (0.2 mmol) and nBu4NPF6 (0.1 M) in HFIP (10 mL), 2.5 mA, RT. [b] Conditions: 1a or 1b (0.2 mmol), NaOAc (0.2 mmol) and nBu4NBF4 (0.2 mmol) in DCE/HFIP (6 mL, 2:1), 7.5 mA, RT. [c] 1a or 1b (0.4 mmol), NaOMe (0.2 mmol) and KBr (0.2 mmol) in methanol (6 mL) at 65 °C, 100 mA, DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane. HFIP = 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol. n.d. = not detected.
Scheme 2.
Scheme 2.
Substrate scope of iodide-mediated dehydrogenative amination. The reaction was conducted on a 0.5 mmol scale, see Supporting Information for details. All yields are isolated yield. [a] 2a has also been produced under conditions with stoichiometric chemical oxidants: PhI(OAc)2/cat. I2, 90%; PhI(OAc)2/I3, 93%; mCPBA/cat. I2, 54%; [b] dr = 1:1. [c] dr = 1.8:1. [d] dr = 1.2 :1. [e] With 2,6-lutidine instead of pyridine as additive. TsOH = p-toluenesulfonic acid.
Scheme 3.
Scheme 3.
Simplified mechanism for photo/electrochemical iodide-mediated dehydrogenative C–H/N–H coupling.
Scheme 4.
Scheme 4.
CVs of iodide and representative substrates. Conditions: 5 mM substate in acetonitrile with KPF6 (0.1 M) as supporting electrolyte, glassy carbon as working electrode (~ 7.0 mm2) and a platinum wire counter electrode, scan rate = 100 mV/s.

References

    1. Torii S, Novel Trends in Elecroorganic Synthesis, Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, 1998;
    2. Lund H, Hammerich O, Organic Electrochemistry, 5th ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015.
    1. For representative recent reviews, see:

    2. Sperry JB, Wright DL, Chem. Soc. Rev 2006, 35, 605; - PubMed
    3. Yoshida J.-i., Kataoka K, Horcajada R, Nagaki A, Chem. Rev 2008, 108, 2265; - PubMed
    4. Francke R, Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 2858; - PMC - PubMed
    5. Yan M, Kawamata Y, Baran PS, Chem. Rev 2017, 117, 13230; - PMC - PubMed
    6. Jiang Y, Xu K, Zeng C, Chem. Rev 2018, 118, 4485; - PubMed
    7. Pletcher D, Green RA, Brown RCD, Chem. Rev 2018, 118, 4573; - PubMed
    8. Tang S, Liu Y, Lei A, Chem 2018, 4, 27;
    9. Wiebe A, Gieshoff T, Möhle S, Rodrigo E, Zirbes M, Waldvogel SR, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 5594; - PMC - PubMed
    10. Möhle S, Zirbes M, Rodrigo E, Gieshoff T, Wiebe A, Waldvogel SR, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 6018; - PMC - PubMed
    11. Yang Q-L, Fang P, Mei T-S, Chin. J. Chem 2018, 36, 338;
    12. Nutting JE, Rafiee MR, Stahl SS, Chem. Rev 2018, 118, 4834. - PMC - PubMed
    1. For examples, see:

    2. Badalyan A, Stahl SS, Nature 2016, 535, 406; - PubMed
    3. Rafiee M, Wang F, Hruszkewycz DP, Stahl SS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 22; - PMC - PubMed
    4. Wang F, Rafiee M, Stahl SS, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 6686; - PMC - PubMed
    5. Lennox AJ, Goes SL, Webster MP, Koolman HF, Djuric SW, Stahl SS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 11227. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masui M, Hara S, Ueshima T, Kawaguchi T, Ozaki S, Chem. Pharm. Bull 1983, 31, 4209;
    2. Masui M, Kawaguchi T, Ozaki S, S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun 1985, 1484;
    3. Horn EJ, Rosen BR, Chen Y, Tang J, Chen K, Eastgate MD, Baran PS, Nature 2016, 533, 77; - PMC - PubMed
    4. Hruszkewycz DP, Miles KC, Thiel OR, Stahl SS, Chem. Sci 2017, 8, 1282; - PMC - PubMed
    5. Kawamata Y, Yan M, Liu Z, Bao D-H, Chen J, Starr JT, Baran PS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 7448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amino Group Chemistry: From Synthesis to the Life Sciences (Eds.:Ricci A), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008, pp. 55–92;
    2. Davies HML, Manning JR, Nature 2008, 451, 417; - PMC - PubMed
    3. Newhouse T, Baran PS, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2011, 50, 3362; - PMC - PubMed
    4. Park Y, Kim Y, Chang S, Chem. Rev 2017, 117, 9247. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources