Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 1;16(Winter):1g.
eCollection 2019 Winter.

Toward the Design of an Engagement Tool for Effective Electronic Health Record Adoption

Affiliations

Toward the Design of an Engagement Tool for Effective Electronic Health Record Adoption

Subrata Acharya et al. Perspect Health Inf Manag. .

Abstract

As healthcare systems continue to expand their use of electronic health records (EHRs), barriers to robust and successful engagement with such systems by stakeholders remain tenacious. To this effect, this research presents the results of a survey tool utilizing both original and modified constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to assess key points of engagement barriers and potential points of intervention for stakeholders of EHRs in a large-scale healthcare organization (500-bed level II regional trauma center). Based on the extensive assessment, the paper presents recommendations for the utility of engagement process modeling and discusses how intervention opportunities can be used to mitigate engagement barriers.

Keywords: adoption; consolidated framework for implementation; electronic health records; intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed Electronic Health Record Engagement Model Abbreviations: CFIR, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; IT, information technology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proposed Electronic Health Record Engagement Process

References

    1. Buntin M. B., Burke M. F., Hoaglin M. C., Blumenthal D. “Benefits of Health Information Technology: A Review of the Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results.”. Health Affairs. (2010);30(no. 3):464–471. - PubMed
    1. Fiscella K., Geiger H. J. “Health Information Technology and Quality Improvement for Community Health Centers.”. Health Affairs. (2006);25(no. 2):405–412. - PubMed
    1. Kaplan B., Harris-Salamone K. D. “Health IT Success and Failure: Recommendations from Literature and an AMIA Workshop.”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. (2009);16(no. 3):291–299. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ibid.
    1. Abbott P. A., Foster J., de Fatima Marin H., Dykes P. C. “Complexity and the Science of Implementation in Health IT—Knowledge Gaps and Future Visions.”. International Journal of Medical Informatics. (2014);83(no.7):e12–e22. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources