Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;8(3):267-274.
doi: 10.1177/1948550616678454. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

Movin' on Up? How Perceptions of Social Mobility Affect Our Willingness to Defend the System

Affiliations

Movin' on Up? How Perceptions of Social Mobility Affect Our Willingness to Defend the System

Martin V Day et al. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

People's motivation to rationalize and defend the status quo is a major barrier to societal change. Three studies tested whether perceived social mobility - beliefs about the likelihood to move up and down the socioeconomic ladder - can condition people's tendency to engage in system justification. Compared to information suggesting moderate social mobility, exposure to low social-mobility frames consistently reduced defense of the overarching societal system. Two studies examined how this effect occurs. Compared to moderate or baseline conditions, a low social-mobility frame reduced people's endorsement of (typically strong) meritocratic and just-world beliefs, which in turn explained lower system defense. These effects occurred for political liberals, moderates, and conservatives, and could not be explained by other system-legitimizing ideologies or people's beliefs about their own social mobility. Implications for societal change programs are discussed.

Keywords: Ideology; Motivation; Social Mobility; System Defense.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bengali L, Daly M. U.S. economic mobility: The dream and the data. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letter (Report No 2013-06) 2013 Retrieved from: http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-letter/2013...
    1. Brown-Iannuzzi JL, Lundberg KB, Kay AC, Payne BK. Subjective status shapes political preferences. Psychological Science. 2015;26:15–26. - PubMed
    1. Davidai S, Gilovich T. Building a more mobile America–one income quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2015;10:60–71. - PubMed
    1. Feygina I, Jost JT, Goldsmith RE. System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2010;36:326–338. - PubMed
    1. Ho EA, Sanbonmatsu DM, Akimoto SA. The effects of comparative status on social stereotypes: How the perceived effect of some persons affects the stereotypes of others. Social Cognition. 2002;20:36–57.

LinkOut - more resources