Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Mar;101(3):141-149.
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0010. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

Systematic review of preoperative carotid duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography carotid angiography for carotid endarterectomy

T Forjoe  1 , M Asad Rahi  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Systematic review of preoperative carotid duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography carotid angiography for carotid endarterectomy

T Forjoe et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: We reviewed the literature for preoperative computed tomography carotid angiography and/or carotid duplex to determine their respective sensitivity and specificity in assessing the degree of carotid stenosis. We aimed to identify whether one imaging modality can accurately identify critical stenosis in patients presenting with transient ischaemic attack or symptoms of a cerebrovascular accident requiring carotid endarterectomy.

Methods: Systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, all Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ACP Journal club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Clinical Answers, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Methodology Register, Health Technology Assessment and NHS Economic Evaluation Database) for primary studies relating to computed tomography carotid angiography (CTA) and/or carotid duplex ultrasound (CDU). Studies included were published between 1990 and 2018 and focused on practice in the UK, Europe and North America.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of CTA and CDU are comparable. CDU is safe and readily available in the clinical environment hence its use in the initial preoperative assessment of carotid stenosis. CDU is an adequate imaging modality for determining stenosis greater than 70%; sensitivity and specificity are improved when the criteria for determining greater than 70% stenosis are adjusted. Vascular laboratories opting to use duplex as their sole imaging modality should assess the sensitivity and specificity of their own duplex procedure before altering practice to preoperative single imaging for patients.

Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of CTA (90.6% and 93%, respectively) and CDU (92.3% and 89%, respectively) are comparable. Both are dependent on criteria used in vascular laboratories. CDU sensitivity and specificity was improved to 98.7% and 94.1%, respectively, where peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity were assessed. Either modality can be used to determine greater than 70% stenosis, although a secondary imaging modality may be required for cases of greater than 50% stenosis.

Keywords: Ultrasonography, doppler, duplex; computed tomography angiography; endarterectomy, carotid; sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography carotid angiography
Figure 2
Figure 2
Studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of carotid duplex ultrasound
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnett HJM, Taylor DW et al. . Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; (7): 445–453. - PubMed
    1. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998; (9113): 1,379–1,387. - PubMed
    1. Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J et al. . Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis: a comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Stroke 1994; (12): 2,435–2,439. - PubMed
    1. Oates CP, Naylor AR, Hartshorne T et al. . Joint Recommendations for Reporting Carotid Ultrasound Investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; (3): 251–261. - PubMed
    1. Maldonado TS. What are current preprocedure imaging requirements for carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: have magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography made a difference? Semin Vasc Surg 2007; (4): 205–215. - PubMed

MeSH terms