Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 May;128(5):944-952.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004038.

Perioperative Epidural Use and Risk of Delirium in Surgical Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the PODCAST Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Perioperative Epidural Use and Risk of Delirium in Surgical Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the PODCAST Trial

Phillip E Vlisides et al. Anesth Analg. 2019 May.

Abstract

Background: Postoperative delirium is an important public health concern without effective prevention strategies. This study tested the hypothesis that perioperative epidural use would be associated with decreased risk of delirium through postoperative day 3.

Methods: This was a secondary, observational, nonrandomized analysis of data from The Prevention of Delirium and Complications Associated With Surgical Treatments Trial (PODCAST; NCT01690988). The primary outcome of the current study was the incidence of delirium (ie, any positive delirium screen, postanesthesia care unit through postoperative day 3) in surgical patients (gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary-pancreatic, gynecologic, and urologic) receiving postoperative epidural analgesia compared to those without an epidural. As a secondary outcome, all delirium assessments were then longitudinally analyzed in relation to epidural use throughout the follow-up period. Given the potential relevance to delirium, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression were also analyzed as secondary outcomes. A semiparsimonious multivariable logistic regression model was used to test the association between postoperative epidural use and delirium incidence, and generalized estimating equations were used to test associations with secondary outcomes described. Models included relevant covariates to adjust for confounding.

Results: In total, 263 patients were included for analysis. Epidural use was not independently associated with reduced delirium incidence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.32-1.35]; P = .247). However, when analyzing all assessments over the follow-up period, epidural patients were 64% less likely to experience an episode of delirium (adjusted odds ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.17-0.78]; P = .009). Adjusted pain scores (visual analog scale, 0-100 mm) were significantly lower in the epidural group on postoperative day 1 (morning, -16 [95% CI, -26 to -7], P < .001; afternoon, -15 [95% CI, -25 to -5], P < .01) and postoperative day 3 (morning, -13 [95% CI, -20 to -5], P < .01). Adjusted mean oral and IV morphine equivalents were also significantly lower on postoperative day 1 in the epidural group (74% lower [95% CI, 55%-85%]; P < .0001). Finally, postoperative epidural use was not significantly associated with new sleep disturbances or changes in depression symptoms.

Conclusions: Postoperative epidural use was not associated with a reduced overall incidence of delirium. However, longitudinal analysis revealed reduced adjusted odds of experiencing an episode of delirium in the epidural group. Epidural use was also associated with reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption. An appropriately designed follow-up study is warranted to further analyze the relationship among epidural use, postoperative delirium, and related outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram depicting sub-study inclusion of PODCAST Trial participants.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proportion of positive delirium assessments during each assessment time point for both groups. Descriptive comparisons, no statistical analysis. In total, 748 assessments were conducted in the non-epidural group (median 6 assessments [4.0 – 7.0]), and 753 assessments were conducted in the epidural group (median 6 assessments [6.0 – 7.0]). PACU = postanesthesia care unit, POD = postoperative day.

References

    1. Avidan MS, Maybrier HR, Abdallah AB et al. Intraoperative ketamine for prevention of postoperative delirium or pain after major surgery in older adults: an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2017;390:267–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dasgupta M, Dumbrell AC. Preoperative risk assessment for delirium after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:1578–89. - PubMed
    1. Witlox J, Eurelings LS, de Jonghe JF, Kalisvaart KJ, Eikelenboom P, van Gool WA. Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdischarge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010;304:443–51. - PubMed
    1. Hshieh TT, Saczynski J, Gou RY et al. Trajectory of functional recovery after postoperative delirium in elective surgery. Ann Surg. 2017;265:647–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saczynski JS, Marcantonio ER, Quach L et al. Cognitive trajectories after postoperative delirium. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:30–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data