Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e025058.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025058.

Breastfeeding and behavioural problems: Propensity score matching with a national cohort of infants in Chile

Affiliations

Breastfeeding and behavioural problems: Propensity score matching with a national cohort of infants in Chile

Lisa-Christine Girard et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Potential effects of breast feeding on children's behaviour remains an elusive debate given inherent methodological challenges. Propensity score matching affords benefits by ensuring greater equivalence on observable social and health determinants, helping to reduce bias between groups.

Objectives: We examined whether the duration of breast feeding had an impact on children's externalising and internalising behaviours.

Study design: A cohort study (Encuesta Longitudinal de la Primera Infancia cohort) that included 3037 Chilean families who were enrolled in 2010. Follow-up data was collected in 2012.

Setting: General community.

Participants: Population-based sample. Eligibility criteria: children born full-term with complete data on matching variables. Matching variables included: healthcare system as a proxy of income, presence of a partner/spouse in the household, maternal age, educational level, IQ, working status, type of work, diagnosis of prenatal depression by a healthcare professional, smoking during pregnancy, delivery type, child sex, weight at birth, incubation following delivery, and child age.

Exposure: Duration of breast feeding.

Main outcomes and measures: Externalising and internalising problems assessed using the Child Behaviour Checklist.

Results: Matched results revealed benefits of any breast feeding, up to 6 months, on emotional reactivity and somatic complaints (mean difference of -1.00, 95% CI, -1.84 to -0.16 and -1.02, 95% CI, -1.76 to -0.28, respectively). Children breast fed between 7 and 12 months also had reduced scores on emotional reactivity, in addition to attention problems (mean difference of -0.86, 95% CI, -1.66 to -0.06 and -0.50, 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.07, respectively). No benefits were observed for children breast fed 13 months or more.

Conclusion: Reduced internalising difficulties and inattention were found in children breast fed up to a year, suggesting that breast feeding may have beneficial impacts on these areas of development. The magnitude of effect was modest. Extended durations of breast feeding did not appear to offer any benefits.

Keywords: behaviour problems; breastfeeding; cohort study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overlapping Support: Distribution of Propensity Scores. Note: Treated refers to children who were breast fed, untreated refers to children who were not. For being breast fed up to 6 months: N for the treatment group was 949 and 110 for the control group. For being breast fed between 7 and 12 months: N for the treatment group was 946 and 110 for the control group. For being breast fed 13 months or more: N for the treatment group was 1006 and 110 for the control group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standardised Differences across Covariates: Pre-Matching and Post-Matching Note: Treated refers to children who were breast fed, untreated refers to children who were not. For being breast fed up to 6 months: N for the treatment group was 949 and 110 for the control group. For being breast fed between 7 and 12 months: N for the treatment group was 946 and 110 for the control group. For being breast fed 13 months or more: N for the treatment group was 1006 and 110 for the control group.

References

    1. Horta BL, Loret de Mola C, Victora CG. Long-term consequences of breastfeeding on cholesterol, obesity, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 2015;104(467):30–7. 10.1111/apa.13133 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, et al. . A summary of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s evidence report on breastfeeding in developed countries. Breastfeed Med 2009;4:S-17–18. 10.1089/bfm.2009.0050 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor JS, Kacmar JE, Nothnagle M, et al. . A systematic review of the literature associating breastfeeding with type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes. J Am Coll Nutr 2005;24:320–6. 10.1080/07315724.2005.10719480 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Britton JR, Britton HL, Gronwaldt V. Breastfeeding, sensitivity, and attachment. Pediatrics 2006;118:e1436–43. 10.1542/peds.2005-2916 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu J, Leung P, Yang A. Breastfeeding and active bonding protects against children’s internalizing behavior problems. Nutrients 2013;6:76–89. 10.3390/nu6010076 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types