Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan;31(1):75-78.
doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.75. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: a systematic review

Richard W Bohannon. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

[Purpose] The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in grip strength is critical to interpreting changes in hand strength over time. This review was undertaken to summarize extant descriptions of the MCID for grip strength. [Methods] A search of 3 bibliographic databases as well as a hand search were completed to identify articles reporting the MCID for grip forces obtained by dynamometry. [Results] Of 38 unique articles identified as potentially relevant, 4 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this review. The MCIDs ranged from 0.04 kg to 6.5 kg. However, only a single study used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and had an associated area under the curve exceeding 0.70. That study reported an MCID of 6.5 kg, which was similar to the MCIDs of another included study and minimal detectable changes reported elsewhere. [Conclusion] Additional, more rigorous, studies are needed to identify MCIDs for grip strength. In the meantime changes of 5.0 to 6.5 kg may be reasonable estimates of meaningful changes in grip strength.

Keywords: Dynamometry; Hand; Muscle strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flowchart illustrating search results and article selection for systematic review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bohannon RW: Muscle strength: clinical and prognostic value of hand-grip dynamometry. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 2015, 18: 465–470. - PubMed
    1. Bohannon RW: Test-retest reliability of measurements of hand-grip strength obtained by dynamometry from older adults: a systematic review of research in the PubMed database. J Frailty Aging, 2017, 6: 83–87. - PubMed
    1. Bohannon RW, Peollson A, Massy-Westropp N, et al. : Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy, 2006, 92: 11–15.
    1. Dodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, et al. : Global variation in grip strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis of normative data. Age Ageing, 2016, 45: 209–216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH: Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials, 1989, 10: 407–415. - PubMed