Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Jan 23:13:405-422.
doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S187690. eCollection 2019.

Statin use and prognosis of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Statin use and prognosis of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials

Dao-Kui Xia et al. Drug Des Devel Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Previous clinical studies reported inconsistent results on the associations of statins with the mortality and survival of lung cancer patients. This review and meta-analysis summarized the impact of statins on mortality and survival of lung cancer patients.

Materials and methods: Eligible papers of this meta-analysis were searched by using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane until July 2017. Primary end points were the mortality (all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality) and survival (progression-free survival and overall survival) of patients with statin use. Secondary end points were overall response rate and safety. The random-effects model was used to calculate pooled HRs and 95% CIs.

Results: Seventeen studies involving 98,445 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In observational studies, the pooled HR indicated that statins potentially decreased the cancer-specific mortality and promoted the overall survival of lung cancer patients. Statins showed an association with decreased all-cause mortality in cohort studies (HR =0.77, 95% CI: 0.59-0.99), but not in case-control studies (HR =0.75, 95% CI: 0.50-1.10). However, statin use showed no impact on mortality and overall survival in randomized controlled trials. Meanwhile, this meta-analysis indicated that statin use did not affect the progression-free survival of lung cancer patients in observational studies and randomized controlled trials. In addition, statins potentially enhanced the effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.98) and chemotherapy (HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.81-0.91) on the overall survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, but did not increase overall response rate and toxicity.

Conclusion: Statins were potentially associated with the decreasing risk of mortality and the improvement of overall survival in observational studies but not in randomized controlled trials.

Keywords: lung cancer; mortality; prognosis; statin; statins; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interests in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the selection of publications included in the meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot: overall meta-analysis of mortality and survival between statin use and lung cancer. Notes: (A) all-cause mortality; (B) cancer-specific mortality; (C) progression-free survival; and (D) overall survival. Weights are from random-effects analysis. Abbreviation: Cc, case-control.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot: overall meta-analysis of mortality and survival between statin use and lung cancer. Notes: (A) all-cause mortality; (B) cancer-specific mortality; (C) progression-free survival; and (D) overall survival. Weights are from random-effects analysis. Abbreviation: Cc, case-control.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot for publication bias of mortality and survival between statin use and lung cancer. Note: (A) all cause mortality (Egger’s test =0.848 and Begg’s test =0.548); (B) cancer-specific mortality (Egger’s test =0.082 and Begg’s test =0.035); (C) progression-free survival (Egger’s test =0.431 and Begg’s test =0.133); and (D) overall survival (Egger’s test =0.425 and Begg’s test =0.732).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hung MS, Chen IC, Lee CP, et al. Statin improves survival in patients with EGFR-TKI lung cancer: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171137. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee YG, Lee JH, Jang JS, Kim JH. Prognostic benefit of statin with or without metformin in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a nationwide population-based outcome study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(15_suppl):e20661.
    1. Huang WY, Li CH, Lin CL, Liang JA. Long-term statin use in patients with lung cancer and dyslipidemia reduces the risk of death. Oncotarget. 2016;7(27):42208–42214. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin JJ, Ezer N, Sigel K, Mhango G, Wisnivesky JP. The effect of statins on survival in patients with stage IV lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2016;99:137–142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lohinai Z, Dome P, Szilagyi Z, et al. From bench to bedside: attempt to evaluate repositioning of drugs in the treatment of metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0144797. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances