Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec 23:8:1-11.
doi: 10.2147/ORR.S92216. eCollection 2016.

Current concept review: quality and process improvement in orthopedics

Stephen J Pinney  1 , Alexandra E Page  2 , David S Jevsevar  3 , Kevin J Bozic  4
Affiliations
Review

Current concept review: quality and process improvement in orthopedics

Stephen J Pinney et al. Orthop Res Rev. .

Abstract

Multiple health care stakeholders are increasingly scrutinizing musculoskeletal care to optimize quality and cost efficiency. This has led to greater emphasis on quality and process improvement. There is a robust set of business strategies that are increasingly being applied to health care delivery. These quality and process improvement tools (QPITs) have specific applications to segments of, or the entire episode of, patient care. In the rapidly changing health care world, it will behoove all orthopedic surgeons to have an understanding of the manner in which care delivery processes can be evaluated and improved. Many of the commonly used QPITs, including checklist initiatives, standardized clinical care pathways, lean methodology, six sigma strategies, and total quality management, embrace basic principles of quality improvement. These principles include focusing on outcomes, optimizing communication among health care team members, increasing process standardization, and decreasing process variation. This review summarizes the common QPITs, including how and when they might be employed to improve care delivery.

Keywords: clinical care pathway; lean thinking; musculoskeletal care; outcomes; quality management; six sigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Donabedian A. The end results of health care: Ernest Codman’s contribution to quality assessment and beyond. Milbank Q. 1989;67(2):233–256. - PubMed
    1. Brand RA. Ernest Amory Codman, MD, 1869–1940. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2763–2765. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2477–2481. - PubMed
    1. Enquist M, Bosco JA, 3rd, Pazand L, Habibi KA, Donoghue RJ, Zuckerman JD. Managing episodes of care: strategies for orthopaedic surgeons in the era of reform. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(10):e55. - PubMed
    1. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Mar 23, 2010. [Accessed October 28, 2015]. Public Law 111-148, 124 Stat 119. Available from: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf.

LinkOut - more resources