Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000899.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000899. eCollection 2019.

Implications of a complexity perspective for systematic reviews and guideline development in health decision making

Affiliations

Implications of a complexity perspective for systematic reviews and guideline development in health decision making

Mark Petticrew et al. BMJ Glob Health. .

Abstract

There is growing interest in the potential for complex systems perspectives in evaluation. This reflects a move away from interest in linear chains of cause-and-effect, towards considering health as an outcome of interlinked elements within a connected whole. Although systems-based approaches have a long history, their concrete implications for health decisions are still being assessed. Similarly, the implications of systems perspectives for the conduct of systematic reviews require further consideration. Such reviews underpin decisions about the implementation of effective interventions, and are a crucial part of the development of guidelines. Although they are tried and tested as a means of synthesising evidence on the effectiveness of interventions, their applicability to the synthesis of evidence about complex interventions and complex systems requires further investigation. This paper, one of a series of papers commissioned by the WHO, sets out the concrete methodological implications of a complexity perspective for the conduct of systematic reviews. It focuses on how review questions can be framed within a complexity perspective, and on the implications for the evidence that is reviewed. It proposes criteria which can be used to determine whether or not a complexity perspective will add value to a review or an evidence-based guideline, and describes how to operationalise key aspects of complexity as concrete research questions. Finally, it shows how these questions map onto specific types of evidence, with a focus on the role of qualitative and quantitative evidence, and other types of information.

Keywords: complex interventions; public health; systematic reviews; systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Causal loop diagram of human health and climate change (Proust et al 44). GHG, Greenhouse gas.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptual framework: soft drinks consumption and childhood obesity in countries with limited access to safe drinking water.

References

    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. . Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. BMJ 2015;350:h1258. 10.1136/bmj.h1258 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byrne D, Callaghan G. Complexity theory and the social sciences: the state of the a rt. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.
    1. Rickles D, Hawe P, Shiell A. A simple guide to chaos and complexity. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:933–7. 10.1136/jech.2006.054254 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matheson A, Walton M, Gray R, et al. . Evaluating a community-based public health intervention using a complex systems approach. J Public Health 2017:1–8. 10.1093/pubmed/fdx117 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources