Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 9;4(2):257-266.
doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.10.003. eCollection 2019 Feb.

Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 or 4 Infection and Advanced Kidney Disease

Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 or 4 Infection and Advanced Kidney Disease

Eric Lawitz et al. Kidney Int Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in patients with end-stage renal disease. We investigated the safety and efficacy of ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir (r) ± dasabuvir (DSV) ± ribavirin (RBV) in 2 phase 3, open-label, multicenter studies in patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods: RUBY-I, Cohort 2 enrolled treatment-naïve or -experienced patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1a or 1b infection, with or without cirrhosis. Patients received 12 weeks (24 weeks for GT1a patients with cirrhosis) of OBV/PTV/r + DSV; all GT1a patients received RBV. RUBY-II enrolled treatment-naïve patients with GT1a or GT4 infection without cirrhosis. All patients received 12 weeks of RBV-free treatment: OBV/PTV/r + DSV for GT1a-infected patients; OBV/PTV/r for GT4-infected patients. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12).

Results: RUBY-I, Cohort 2 and RUBY-II enrolled 66 patients, including 50 (76%) on dialysis; 15 (23%) had compensated cirrhosis. Overall, the SVR12 rate was 95% (63/66); 1 patient had virologic failure. There were 3 discontinuations due to adverse events. Seventy-three percent (27/37) of patients receiving RBV had adverse events leading to RBV dose modification. The RBV-free RUBY-II study had no hemoglobin-associated adverse events.

Conclusion: Treatment with OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV was well tolerated and patients with HCV GT1 or 4 infection and stage 4 or 5 CKD had high SVR12 rates, including patients with compensated cirrhosis and/or prior treatment experience.

Keywords: NS3/4A protease inhibitor; NS5A inhibitor; RUBY; chronic kidney disease; renal disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
RUBY-I, Cohort 2 and RUBY-II study design. Cohort 2 of RUBY-I included 2 arms, A and B, that enrolled patients with genotype (GT)1a infection and were treated with ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir (r) + dasabuvir (DSV) ± ribavirin (RBV). Patients in arm A were noncirrhotic and were treated for 12 weeks. Patients with cirrhosis were enrolled into arm B and were treated for 24 weeks. Patients in arm C of RUBY-I, Cohort 2 had GT1b infection and were treated with OBV/PTV/r + DSV without RBV for 12 weeks. In RUBY-II, all patients were noncirrhotic; those with GT1a were treated with OBV/PTV/r + DSV without RBV for 12 weeks. Patients with GT4 infection were treated with OBV/PTV/r without RBV for 12 weeks. SVR12, sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12) rates across the RUBY study series. This graph shows SVR12 rates across all of the RUBY studies, including RUBY-I, Cohort 1. Both RUBY-I, Cohort 2 and RUBY-II included patients with prior hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment experience; however, in RUBY-II, patients were noncirrhotic and ribavirin (RBV) was not coadministered for patients with any HCV genotype. Overall, in patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease, treatment with ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir (r) ± dasabuvir (DSV) regimens resulted in high SVR rates for patients with HCV genotype (GT)1 or 4 infection, including those with concomitant cirrhosis and prior treatment experience. Tx, treatment; w/, with.

References

    1. Blach S., Zeuzem S., Manns M. Global prevalence and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in 2015: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:161–176. - PubMed
    1. Perz J.F., Armstrong G.L., Farrington L.A., Hutin Y.J., Bell B.P. The contributions of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections to cirrhosis and primary liver cancer worldwide. J Hepatol. 2006;45:529–538. - PubMed
    1. Okoh E.J., Bucci J.R., Simon J.F., Harrison S.A. HCV in patients with end-stage renal disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2123–2134. - PubMed
    1. Lee J.J., Lin M.Y., Chang J.S. Hepatitis C virus infection increases risk of developing end-stage renal disease using competing risk analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e100790. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu C.H., Kao J.H. Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:228–239. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources