Techniques and developments in automated perimetry: a review
- PMID: 3077648
- DOI: 10.1016/0275-5408(88)90180-9
Techniques and developments in automated perimetry: a review
Abstract
The development of automated perimetry represents one of the major opportunities for clinical advancement over the last 30 years. Compared with the data obtained from equivalent manual procedures, the technique now makes feasible a rapid and reliable static threshold investigation of the visual field and, as a result, has revolutionized the potential of the visual field examination in the diagnosis of ocular and neuro-ophthalmic abnormality. Several perimeters are commercially available, each featuring a variety of stimulus parameters for investigating the visual field and a range of data reduction techniques and displays to aid the clinician in the interpretation of abnormality. The choice of stimulus, however, governs the format of the derived field and thus the efficiency of detecting and assessing a given field defect. In addition, patient-specific variables also influence the visual field profile. This review outlines the techniques used in automated perimetry. In particular, the rationale is summarized for the choice of the major stimulus parameters employed by a given perimeter, such a stimulus type, adaptation level and testing strategy. The techniques available for data display and reduction are reviewed and the extraneous factors influencing the format of the normal differential sensitivity gradient are discussed.
Comment in
-
Autoperimeters--essential clinical tools or white elephants?Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1989 Apr;9(2):225-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1989.tb00850.x. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1989. PMID: 2622660 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jun;131(6):734-41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)00837-6. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001. PMID: 11384569
-
Automated suprathreshold static perimetry screening for detecting neuro-ophthalmologic disease.Ophthalmology. 1996 Jun;103(6):907-17. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30588-5. Ophthalmology. 1996. PMID: 8643246
-
Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep;120(9):1162-73. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.9.1162. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002. PMID: 12215089
-
Heidelberg Edge Perimeter: The New Method of Perimetry.Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;24(6):1105-12. doi: 10.17219/acem/43834. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015. PMID: 26771985 Review.
-
Pitfalls of automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1995 Apr;6(2):46-51. doi: 10.1097/00055735-199504000-00008. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1995. PMID: 10150857 Review.
Cited by
-
Using natural viewing behavior to screen for and reconstruct visual field defects.J Vis. 2020 Sep 2;20(9):11. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.9.11. J Vis. 2020. PMID: 32940625 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting Diabetic Retinal Neuropathy Using Fundus Perimetry.Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 3;22(19):10726. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910726. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34639066 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Microperimetry differences in macular sensitivity threshold between first and second tested eyes.Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2021 May-Jun;84(3):203-208. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20210034. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2021. PMID: 33567023 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources