Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr-Jun;16(2):160-165.
doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_265_18.

Robotic-assisted surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: A single-centre experience

Affiliations

Robotic-assisted surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: A single-centre experience

Simone Guadagni et al. J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the liver is increasingly widespread, its role in the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) remains uncertain. In this setting, the role of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has not been significantly evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to report our experience with RAS for treatment of CRLM.

Material and methods: Prospectively collected surgical and oncologic data on all of the robotic-assisted liver resections for CRLM performed at our centre were retrieved from the institutional database and retrospectively analysed. Intra-operative ultrasound (US) was obtained with a dedicated robotic probe using the TilePro™ function.

Results: Twenty patients underwent robotic-assisted resection of CRLM between May 2012 and April 2018. Six patients (30%) had multiple synchronous CRLM resections (median = 2; range 2-4). The tumour size averaged 3.0 ± 1.8 cm. All of the lesions were removed using a parenchymal-sparing approach, with R0 resection margins. Mean hospital stay was 4.7 ± 1.8 days. The mean follow-up was 22.5 ± 19.5 months. During the study period, there were no local recurrences, while 9 patients (45%) developed new systemic metastasis. All patients are still alive as of September 2018 with 1- and 3-year disease-free survival of 89.5% and 35.8%, respectively.

Conclusions: In our experience, RAS for CRLM surgical treatment was feasible and played a positive role even in patients with multiple metastases and previous or synchronous surgery. RAS seemed to be oncologically effective in this setting, as no patients experienced local relapse in the treated area.

Keywords: Colorectal metastasis; da Vinci; intra-operative ultrasound; minimally invasive surgery; robotic-assisted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier curve showing disease-free survival trend

References

    1. Simmonds PC, Primrose JN, Colquitt JL, Garden OJ, Poston GJ, Rees M, et al. Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: A systematic review of published studies. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:982–99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Julien LA, Thorson AG. Current neoadjuvant strategies in rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:321–6. - PubMed
    1. Alvarez FA, Sanchez Claria R, Oggero S, de Santibañes E. Parenchymal-sparing liver surgery in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8:407–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, Grothey A, Pawlik TM, Choti MA, et al. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: Expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1261–8. - PubMed
    1. Welsh FK, Tekkis PP, John TG, Rees M. Open liver resection for colorectal metastases: Better short- and long-term outcomes in patients potentially suitable for laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 2010;12:188–94. - PMC - PubMed