Work Group Climate and Behavioral Responses to Psychological Contract Breach
- PMID: 30778308
- PMCID: PMC6369362
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00067
Work Group Climate and Behavioral Responses to Psychological Contract Breach
Abstract
Drawing on theories of social exchange and social information processing, we examined whether the influence of psychological contract breach on in-role performance and organization-directed citizenship behavior (OCBO) depends on work group climate levels, specifically procedural justice climate and power distance climate. The findings supported our hypothesis that psychological contract breach more strongly influences in-role performance and OCBO among members of units with favorable procedural justice climates. Support for a hypothesized moderating role of power distance climate was less conclusive. We discuss the implications of our model and findings for theories of employee-organization relationships and practice.
Keywords: job performance; organizational citisenship behavior; power distance climate; procedural justice climate; psychological contract breach.
Figures



Similar articles
-
The New and Key Roles for Psychological Contract Status and Engagement in Predicting Various Performance Behaviors of Nurses.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;19(21):13931. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113931. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36360809 Free PMC article.
-
The relationships between perceived organizational support, affective commitment, psychological contract breach, organizational citizenship behaviour and work engagement.J Adv Nurs. 2016 Nov;72(11):2806-2817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13043. Epub 2016 Jul 5. J Adv Nurs. 2016. PMID: 27293180
-
Job Security and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in Chinese Hybrid Employment Context: Organizational Identification Versus Psychological Contract Breach Perspective Differences Across Employment Status.Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 24;12:627934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627934. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33732191 Free PMC article.
-
[Psychological contract in the light of flexible employment: The review of studies].Med Pr. 2016;67(4):529-36. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00328. Med Pr. 2016. PMID: 27623833 Review. Polish.
-
Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives.J Appl Psychol. 2013 Mar;98(2):199-236. doi: 10.1037/a0031757. J Appl Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23458336 Review.
Cited by
-
Cultural Differences in The Content of Employees' Psychological Contract: A Qualitative Study Comparing Belgium and China.Psychol Belg. 2020 Jun 1;60(1):132-151. doi: 10.5334/pb.498. Psychol Belg. 2020. PMID: 32523710 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Low-Frequency Noise, Infrasound, and Health Symptoms at an Administrative Building and Men's Shelter: A Case Study.Semin Hear. 2023 Jun 5;44(4):503-520. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769497. eCollection 2023 Nov. Semin Hear. 2023. PMID: 37818147 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do overqualified employees hide knowledge? The mediating role of psychological contract breach.Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 5;13:842725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842725. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36148104 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 and unpaid leave: Impacts of psychological contract breach on organizational distrust and turnover intention: Mediating role of emotional exhaustion.Tour Manag Perspect. 2021 Jul;39:100854. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100854. Epub 2021 Jun 26. Tour Manag Perspect. 2021. PMID: 34513584 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of psychological contract breach on firm's innovative performance: A moderated mediation model.Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 24;13:970622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.970622. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36092046 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
-
- Bal P. M., Chiaburu D. S., Jansen P. G. W. (2010). Psychological contract breach and work performance: is social exchange a buffer or an intensifier? J. Manage. Psychol. 25 252–273. 10.1108/02683941011023730 - DOI
-
- Bliese P. D. (2000). “Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis,” in Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations, eds Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; ).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources