[Attentional bias processing mechanism of emotional faces: anger and happiness superiority effects]
- PMID: 30778507
[Attentional bias processing mechanism of emotional faces: anger and happiness superiority effects]
Abstract
Emotional information is critical for our social life, in which attentional bias is now a focus in the study on attention. However, the attentional bias processing mechanism of emotional faces still arouses huge controversy. Using similar experimental paradigms and stimuli, the published studies have yielded contradictory results. Some studies suggest that angry faces could automatically stimulate attention, that is, there is an anger superiority effect. On the contrary, lines of growing evidence support the existence of a happiness superiority effect, suggesting that the superiority effect is shown in happy faces rather than angry faces. In the present paper, the behavioral and neuroscience studies of anger and happiness superiority effects are combined. It is found that there are three major reasons for the debate over the two types of effects, which include the choice of stimulus materials, the difference of paradigm setting, and the different stages of emotional processing. By comparatively integrating the previous published results, we highlight that the future studies should further control the experimental materials and procedures, and investigate the processing mechanism of anger and happiness superiority effects by combining cognitive neurobiology means to resolve the disputes.
Similar articles
-
Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms.Neural Plast. 2021 May 27;2021:8851066. doi: 10.1155/2021/8851066. eCollection 2021. Neural Plast. 2021. PMID: 34135956 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In search of the emotional face: anger versus happiness superiority in visual search.Emotion. 2013 Aug;13(4):758-68. doi: 10.1037/a0031970. Epub 2013 Mar 25. Emotion. 2013. PMID: 23527503
-
Electroencephalographic theta oscillatory dynamics reveal attentional bias to angry faces.Neurosci Lett. 2017 Aug 24;656:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.06.047. Epub 2017 Jun 27. Neurosci Lett. 2017. PMID: 28663051
-
Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:136-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 13. Neuropsychologia. 2016. PMID: 26878979
-
Current status of the anger superiority hypothesis: A meta-analytic review of N2pc studies.Psychophysiology. 2021 Jan;58(1):e13700. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13700. Epub 2020 Oct 11. Psychophysiology. 2021. PMID: 33040366 Review.
Cited by
-
Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms.Neural Plast. 2021 May 27;2021:8851066. doi: 10.1155/2021/8851066. eCollection 2021. Neural Plast. 2021. PMID: 34135956 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Study of Subliminal Emotion Classification Based on Entropy Features.Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 25;13:781448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.781448. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35401346 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of emotion words activation and satiation on facial expression perception: evidence from behavioral and ERP investigations.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 31;14:1192450. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1192450. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37588024 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of emotional feedback material type on attentional capture at different presentation times.PLoS One. 2024 Sep 16;19(9):e0310022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310022. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39283871 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources