Adjunctive Intermittent Pneumatic Compression for Venous Thromboprophylaxis
- PMID: 30779530
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816150
Adjunctive Intermittent Pneumatic Compression for Venous Thromboprophylaxis
Abstract
Background: Whether adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression in critically ill patients receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis would result in a lower incidence of deep-vein thrombosis than pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone is uncertain.
Methods: We randomly assigned patients who were considered adults according to the local standards at the participating sites (≥14, ≥16, or ≥18 years of age) within 48 hours after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) to receive either intermittent pneumatic compression for at least 18 hours each day in addition to pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin (pneumatic compression group) or pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone (control group). The primary outcome was incident (i.e., new) proximal lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis, as detected on twice-weekly lower-limb ultrasonography after the third calendar day since randomization until ICU discharge, death, attainment of full mobility, or trial day 28, whichever occurred first.
Results: A total of 2003 patients underwent randomization - 991 were assigned to the pneumatic compression group and 1012 to the control group. Intermittent pneumatic compression was applied for a median of 22 hours (interquartile range, 21 to 23) daily for a median of 7 days (interquartile range, 4 to 13). The primary outcome occurred in 37 of 957 patients (3.9%) in the pneumatic compression group and in 41 of 985 patients (4.2%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 1.44; P = 0.74). Venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or any lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis) occurred in 103 of 991 patients (10.4%) in the pneumatic compression group and in 95 of 1012 patients (9.4%) in the control group (relative risk, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.44), and death from any cause at 90 days occurred in 258 of 990 patients (26.1%) and 270 of 1011 patients (26.7%), respectively (relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.13).
Conclusions: Among critically ill patients who were receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression did not result in a significantly lower incidence of proximal lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis than pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone. (Funded by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center; PREVENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02040103; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN44653506.).
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
A Device on Trial - Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Critical Care.N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380(14):1367-1368. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1902334. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 30943342 No abstract available.
-
Adding intermittent pneumatic compression to UFH or LMWH did not reduce proximal DVT in critically ill patients.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jun 18;170(12):JC66. doi: 10.7326/ACPJ201906180-066. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31207619 No abstract available.
-
Pneumatic Compression in Venous Thromboprophylaxis.N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 4;381(1):94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1905933. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 31269375 No abstract available.
-
Pneumatic Compression in Venous Thromboprophylaxis.N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 4;381(1):94-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1905933. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 31269376 No abstract available.
-
Intermittent pneumatic compression plus pharmacological thromboprophylaxis to prevent deep vein thrombosis.J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):1731-1733. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.38. J Thorac Dis. 2019. PMID: 31285860 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Intermittent pneumatic compression on top of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in intensive care: added value or added cost?J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):1734-1737. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.31. J Thorac Dis. 2019. PMID: 31285861 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Does this recent randomised controlled trial of intermittent pneumatic compression devices really indicate that they are ineffective in critical care patients?J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jun;11(6):2195-2197. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.72. J Thorac Dis. 2019. PMID: 31372250 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
[Additive therapies : Intensive care studies from 2018-2019].Anaesthesist. 2020 Jan;69(1):52-54. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00642-3. Anaesthesist. 2020. PMID: 31444507 German. No abstract available.
-
Critical Care Prophylaxis. Sometimes Less Is More.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec 15;200(12):1539-1541. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201904-0821RR. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31647308 No abstract available.
-
Efficacy and safety profiles of mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(Suppl 6):S224. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.44. Ann Transl Med. 2019. PMID: 31656803 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Interpretation of the PREVENT study findings on the adjunctive role of intermittent pneumatic compression to prevent venous thromboembolism.Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(11):725. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.68. Ann Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 32617345 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical