Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4738-4743.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816654116. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

The global mass and average rate of rubisco

Affiliations

The global mass and average rate of rubisco

Yinon M Bar-On et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Photosynthetic carbon assimilation enables energy storage in the living world and produces most of the biomass in the biosphere. Rubisco (d-ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) is responsible for the vast majority of global carbon fixation and has been claimed to be the most abundant protein on Earth. Here we provide an updated and rigorous estimate for the total mass of Rubisco on Earth, concluding it is ≈0.7 Gt, more than an order of magnitude higher than previously thought. We find that >90% of Rubisco enzymes are found in the ≈2 × 1014 m2 of leaves of terrestrial plants, and that Rubisco accounts for ≈3% of the total mass of leaves, which we estimate at ≈30 Gt dry weight. We use our estimate for the total mass of Rubisco to derive the effective time-averaged catalytic rate of Rubisco of ≈0.03 s-1 on land and ≈0.6 s-1 in the ocean. Compared with the maximal catalytic rate observed in vitro at 25 °C, the effective rate in the wild is ≈100-fold slower on land and sevenfold slower in the ocean. The lower ambient temperature, and Rubisco not working at night, can explain most of the difference from laboratory conditions in the ocean but not on land, where quantification of many more factors on a global scale is needed. Our analysis helps sharpen the dramatic difference between laboratory and wild environments and between the terrestrial and marine environments.

Keywords: Rubisco; primary productivity; quantitative biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
A schematic representation of our methodology for estimating the mass of Rubisco. Our methodology for estimating the mass of terrestrial Rubisco comprises two parts: estimating the total mass of leaves and estimating the mean mass fraction Rubisco out of the dry leaf mass. Our methodology for estimating the mass of marine Rubisco is based on an estimate of the total biomass of marine autotrophs, as well as on reports on the fraction of Rubisco out of the dry weight of autotrophs.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The distribution of the fraction of Rubisco out of the dry mass of leaves. Each color denotes a different category of plant growth form, with dark-green values representing woody plants and the lighter-green values representing C3 herbaceous plants. The vertical line indicates the average fraction for each growth form used for the analysis.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Estimating the effective rate of an average Rubisco. (A) We use estimates for the total annual rate of carbon fixation—the gross primary productivity—in the terrestrial and marine environments, in conjunction with our estimates of the total mass of Rubisco in those environments. We convert the units of the total rate of carbon fixation to reactions per second using the fact that each reaction of Rubisco fixes one carbon atom, which has a mass of 12 Da. We also convert our estimates for the total mass of Rubisco into the number of active sites by dividing the total mass by the molecular weight of an active site. By dividing the total amount of reactions that all the active sites are performing each second by the total number of active sites, we get an estimate of the average rate of a single active site. B and C show the calculations for terrestrial and marine Rubisco, respectively.

References

    1. Raven JA. Contributions of anoxygenic and oxygenic phototrophy and chemolithotrophy to carbon and oxygen fluxes in aquatic environments. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2009;56:177–192.
    1. Ellis RJ. The most abundant protein in the world. Trends Biochem Sci. 1979;4:241–244.
    1. Verzár F. Aging of the collagen fiber. In: Hall DA, editor. International Review of Connective Tissue Research. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1964. pp. 243–300. - PubMed
    1. Wang Z, et al. Total body protein: A new cellular level mass and distribution prediction model. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:979–984. - PubMed
    1. Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P. Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science. 1998;281:237–240. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources