Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;143(3):e20182001.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2001. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

Predictive Validity of a 2-Question Alcohol Screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-Year Follow-up

Affiliations

Predictive Validity of a 2-Question Alcohol Screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-Year Follow-up

James G Linakis et al. Pediatrics. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) 2-question screen is a valid adolescent alcohol screening tool. No studies have examined if this tool predicts future alcohol problems. We conducted a study at 16 pediatric emergency departments to determine the tool's predictive validity for alcohol misuse and alcohol use disorders (AUDs).

Methods: Participants (N = 4834) completed a baseline assessment battery. A subsample of participants completed the battery at 1, 2, and 3 years follow up.

Results: Of the 2209 participants assigned to follow-up, 1611 (73%) completed a 1-year follow-up, 1591 (72%) completed a 2-year follow-up, and 1377 (62%) completed a 3-year follow-up. The differences in AUDs between baseline NIAAA screen nondrinkers and lower-risk drinkers were statistically significant at 1 year (P = .0002), 2 years (P <.0001), and 3 years (P = .0005), as were the differences between moderate- and highest-risk drinkers at 1 and 2 years (P < .0001 and P = .0088, respectively) but not at 3 years (P = .0758). The best combined score for sensitivity (86.2% at 1 year, 75.6% at 2 years, and 60.0% at 3 years) and specificity (78.1% at 1 year, 79.2% at 2 years, and 80.0% at 3 years) was achieved by using "lower risk" and higher as a cutoff for the prediction of a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition diagnosis.

Conclusions: The NIAAA 2-question screen can accurately characterize adolescent risk for future AUDs. Future studies are needed to determine optimaluse of the screen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
ROC curve for the NIAAA 2-question screen when predicting DSM-5 diagnoses at follow-up. NPV, net present value; PPV, positive predictive value.

Comment in

References

    1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Alcohol screening and brief intervention for youth: a practitioner’s guide. 2011. Available at: www.niaaa.nih.gov/YouthGuide. Accessed December 15, 2017
    1. Kokotailo PK; Committee on Substance Abuse . Alcohol use by youth and adolescents: a pediatric concern. Pediatrics. 2010;125(5):1078–1087 - PubMed
    1. American College of Emergency Physicians Alcohol screening in the emergency department policy statement. 2011. Available at: https://www.acep.org/patient-care/policy-statements/alcohol-screening-in.... Accessed January 13, 2019
    1. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Resources for optimal care of the injured patient, Sixth Edition. 2014. Available at: www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/tqp/center-programs/vrc. Accessed January 13, 2019
    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment. 2017. Available at: www.samhsa.gov/sbirt. Accessed January 13, 2019

Publication types