Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Feb 19;9(1):2273.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38630-7.

tDCS-induced episodic memory enhancement and its association with functional network coupling in older adults

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

tDCS-induced episodic memory enhancement and its association with functional network coupling in older adults

Daria Antonenko et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) augments training-induced cognitive gains, an issue of particular relevance in the aging population. However, negative outcomes have been reported as well, and few studies so far have evaluated the impact of tDCS on episodic memory formation in elderly cohorts. The heterogeneity of previous findings highlights the importance of elucidating neuronal underpinnings of tDCS-induced modulations, and of determining individual predictors of a positive response. In the present study, we aimed to modulate episodic memory formation in 34 older adults with anodal tDCS (1 mA, 20 min) over left temporoparietal cortex. Participants were asked to learn novel associations between pictures and pseudowords, and episodic memory performance was subsequently assessed during immediate retrieval. Prior to experimental sessions, participants underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. tDCS led to better retrieval performance and augmented learning curves. Hippocampo-temporoparietal functional connectivity was positively related to initial memory performance, and was positively associated with the magnitude of individual tDCS-induced enhancement. In sum, we provide evidence for brain stimulation-induced plasticity of episodic memory processes in older adults, corroborating and extending previous findings. Our results demonstrate that intrinsic network coupling may determine individual responsiveness to brain stimulation, and thus help to further explain variability of tDCS responsiveness in older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Accuracy in the episodic memory task. (a) Percentage of correct responses in the five learning blocks (L1-L5) and the two retrieval blocks (R1, R2). Means and (one side of) two-sided 95%-CIs are shown. (b) Boxplots and individual data points for main outcome variable R1, created with BoxPlotR (http://boxplot.tyerslab.com/). *p < 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reaction time in the memory task. Mean reaction time (in ms) during the five learning blocks (L1-L5) and the two retrieval blocks (R1, R2). Means and (one side of) two-sided 95%-CIs are shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatterplot of functional connectivity and memory performance. Functional connectivity between the left hippocampus and left temporoparietal cortex correlated with task performance at baseline (R, retrieval). The significant cluster that emerged from whole-brain seed-to-voxel analyses had peak coordinates of x = −40, y = −52, z = 18, T = 4.45, cluster size k = 232 mm², cluster-p-FDR = 0.040. The scatterplot illustrates the relationship (baseline performance is plotted over individual functional connectivity that was extracted from the significant cluster).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Partial regression plot (residuals) for the association between functional connectivity and individual responsiveness to tDCS (β = 0.31, p = 0.036). Linear regression included the difference in performance in anodal and sham stimulation condition as dependent variable and functional connectivity between hippocampus and angular gyrus as independent variable, adjusted for performance in sham stimulation condition, session order and age.

References

    1. Perceval G, Floel A, Meinzer M. Can transcranial direct current stimulation counteract age-associated functional impairment? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;65:157–172. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coffman BA, Clark VP, Parasuraman R. Battery powered thought: enhancement of attention, learning, and memory in healthy adults using transcranial direct current stimulation. NeuroImage. 2014;85(Pt 3):895–908. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.083. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bikson M, Name A, Rahman A. Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:688. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00688. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dayan E, Censor N, Buch ER, Sandrini M, Cohen LG. Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:838–844. doi: 10.1038/nn.3422. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woods AJ, et al. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2016;127:1031–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types