Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Oct;30(10):1639-1646.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03895-z. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

Outpatient visits versus telephone interviews for postoperative care: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Outpatient visits versus telephone interviews for postoperative care: a randomized controlled trial

Jennifer C Thompson et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Our aim was to determine whether postoperative telephone follow-up was noninferior to in-person clinic visits based on patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were safety and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Women scheduled for pelvic surgery were recruited from a single academic institution and randomized to clinic or telephone follow-up. The clinic group returned for visits 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively and the telephone group received a call from a nurse at the same time intervals. Women completed the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Surgical Care Survey (S-CAHPS) questionnaire, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20, and pain scales prior to and 3 months postoperatively. Randomized patients who completed the S-CAHPS at 3 months were included for analysis. Sample size calculations, based on a 15% noninferiority limit in the S-CAHPS global assessment surgeon rating, required 100 participants, with power = 80% and alpha = 0.025.

Results: From October 2016 to November 2017, 100 participants were consented, underwent surgery, were randomized, and included in the final analysis (clinic group n = 50, telephone group n = 50). Mean age was 58.5 ± 12.2 years. Demographic data and surgery type, dichotomized into outpatient and inpatient, did not differ between groups. The S-CAHPS global assessment surgeon rating from patients in the telephone group was noninferior to the clinic group (92 vs 88%, respectively, rated their surgeons 9 and10, with a noninferiority limit of 36.1; p = 0.006). Adverse events did not differ between groups (n = 26; 57% fclinic vs 43% telephone; p = 0.36). Patients in the telephone group did not require additional emergency room or primary care visits. Clinical outcome measures improved in both groups, with no differences (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Telephone follow-up after pelvic floor surgery results in noninferior patient satisfaction, without differences in clinical outcomes or adverse events. Telephone follow-up may improve healthcare quality and decrease patient and provider burden for postoperative care.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02891187.

Keywords: Patient satisfaction; Postoperative care; Telephone visits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
The Consort Diagram describes the enrollment, randomization, and individuals included for the final analysis

Comment in

References

    1. Cortese DA and Korsmo JO, Putting U.S. health care on the right track. N Engl J Med, 2009. 361(14): p. 1326–7. - PubMed
    1. Porter ME, What is value in health care? N Engl J Med, 2010. 363(26): p. 2477–81. - PubMed
    1. Fischer K, et al., Efficacy and utility of phone call follow-up after pediatric general surgery versus traditional clinic follow-up. Perm J, 2015. 19(1): p. 11–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosbe KW, et al., Efficacy of postoperative follow-up telephone calls for patients who underwent adenotonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2000. 126(6): p. 718–21; discussion 722. - PubMed
    1. Kimman ML, et al., Economic evaluation of four follow-up strategies after curative treatment for breast cancer: results of an RCT. Eur J Cancer, 2011. 47(8): p. 1175–85. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data