Genetic analysis of the grapevine genotypes of the Russian Vitis ampelographic collection using iPBS markers
- PMID: 30783944
- DOI: 10.1007/s10709-019-00055-5
Genetic analysis of the grapevine genotypes of the Russian Vitis ampelographic collection using iPBS markers
Abstract
Cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sativa D.C.) is one of the oldest agricultural crops, each variety comprising an array of clones obtained by vegetative propagation from a selected vine grown from a single seedling. Most clones within a variety are identical, but some show a different form of accession, giving rise to new divergent phenotypes. Understanding the associations among the genotypes within a variety is crucial to efficient management and effective grapevine improvement. Inter-primer binding-site (iPBS) markers may aid in determining the new clones inside closely related genotypes. Following this idea, iPBS markers were used to assess the genetic variation of 33 grapevine genotypes collected from Russia. We used molecular markers to identify the differences among and within five grapevine clonal populations and analysed the variation, using clustering and statistical approaches. Four of a total of 30 PBS primers were selected, based on amplification efficiency. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with PBS primers resulted in a total of 1412 bands ranging from 300 to 6000 bp, with a polymorphism ratio of 44%, ranging from 58 to 75 bands per group. In total, were identified seven private bands in 33 genotypes. Results of molecular variance analysis showed that 40% of the total variation was observed within groups and only 60% between groups. Cluster analysis clearly showed that grapevine genotypes are highly divergent and possess abundant genetic diversities. The iPBS PCR-based genome fingerprinting technology used in this study effectively differentiated genotypes into five grapevine groups and indicated that iPBS markers are useful tools for clonal selection. The number of differences between clones was sufficient to identify them as separate clones of studied varieties containing unique mutations. Our previous phenotypic and phenological studies have confirmed that these genotypes differ from those of maternal plants. This work emphasized the need for a better understanding of the genotypic differences among closely related varieties of grapevine and has implications for the management of its selection processes.
Keywords: Clonal selection; Genetic diversity; Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sativa D.C.); Inter-Primer Binding Site (iPBS); Molecular markers.
Similar articles
-
Collection and characterization of grapevine genetic resources (Vitis vinifera) in the Holy Land, towards the renewal of ancient winemaking practices.Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 17;7:44463. doi: 10.1038/srep44463. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28303928 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular and cellular mechanisms of diversity within grapevine varieties.Heredity (Edinb). 2010 Apr;104(4):331-40. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.161. Epub 2009 Nov 25. Heredity (Edinb). 2010. PMID: 19935824 Review.
-
AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among aromatic grapevines (Vitis vinifera).Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Oct;107(6):1043-7. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1354-5. Epub 2003 Jul 24. Theor Appl Genet. 2003. PMID: 12898028
-
An extensive study of the genetic diversity within seven French wine grape variety collections.Theor Appl Genet. 2010 Apr;120(6):1219-31. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1250-8. Theor Appl Genet. 2010. PMID: 20062965
-
A forensic perspective on the genetic identification of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties using STR markers.Electrophoresis. 2014 Nov;35(21-22):3201-7. doi: 10.1002/elps.201400107. Epub 2014 Oct 1. Electrophoresis. 2014. PMID: 25146979 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of retrotransposon based iPBS markers for determination of genetic relationship among some Chestnut Cultivars (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Türkiye.Mol Biol Rep. 2023 Oct;50(10):8397-8405. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-08697-7. Epub 2023 Aug 24. Mol Biol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37615924
-
Genetic diversity analysis and DNA fingerprint construction of Zanthoxylum species based on SSR and iPBS markers.BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):843. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05373-1. BMC Plant Biol. 2024. PMID: 39244564 Free PMC article.
-
Modern Plant Breeding Techniques in Crop Improvement and Genetic Diversity: From Molecular Markers and Gene Editing to Artificial Intelligence-A Critical Review.Plants (Basel). 2024 Sep 24;13(19):2676. doi: 10.3390/plants13192676. Plants (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39409546 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genetic Diversity and Pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia spp. Isolates Associated with Red Cabbage in Samsun (Turkey).J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Mar 21;7(3):234. doi: 10.3390/jof7030234. J Fungi (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33801129 Free PMC article.
-
Integration of machine learning models with microsatellite markers: New avenue in world grapevine germplasm characterization.Biochem Biophys Rep. 2024 Mar 10;38:101678. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101678. eCollection 2024 Jul. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2024. PMID: 38495412 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources