Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 14;34(1):e20190010000010.
doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020190010000010.

The role of laparoscopy in the propaedeutics of gynecological diagnosis1

Gislaine Laperuta Serafim Argentino  1 , Flávia Neves Bueloni-Dias  2 , Nilton José Leite  1 , Gustavo Filipov Peres  1 , Leonardo Vieira Elias  1 , Vitória Cristina Bortolani  3 , Carlos Roberto Padovani  4 , Daniel Spadoto-Dias  2 , Rogério Dias  5
Affiliations

The role of laparoscopy in the propaedeutics of gynecological diagnosis1

Gislaine Laperuta Serafim Argentino et al. Acta Cir Bras. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate agreement between pre- and post-laparoscopy gynecological diagnosis in order to demonstrate the rationality of this minimally invasive technique use in gynecological propaedeutics.

Methods: Retrospective chart review study conducted between March 2010 and October 2016 based on a convenience sample. 315 patients undergoing surgical laparoscopy at the Center of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Family Planning of Botucatu Medical School/UNESP. Pre- and postoperative diagnoses were compared by the diagnosis agreement test considering the proportions of events.

Results: Laparoscopy contributed to diagnosis in 59.6% of infertility cases (P>0.05), in 93.7% of chronic pelvic pain of undetermined origin (P<0.01) and conclusively elucidated the diagnosis of acute abdomen and the ruling out of tubo-ovarian abcess (P<0.05). Laparoscopy also increased the diagnosis of pelvic-abdominal adhesions in 76.7% (P>0.05).

Conclusion: The use of laparoscopy considerably contributed to diagnostic elucidation, especially in cases of undetermined chronic pelvic pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none

Figures

Figure <b>1</b>
Figure 1. Flowchart of diagnosis in 315 patients who underwent surgical laparoscopy between March 2010 and October 2016 in the Gynecologic Endoscopy Service of Botucatu Medical School/UNESP.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Post-laparoscopy diagnosis of preoperative undefined infertility.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Post- laparoscopy diagnosis of preoperative chronic pelvic pain of undetermined origin.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bachmann LM, ter Riet G, Clark TJ, Gupta JK, Khan KS. Probability analysis for diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in postmenopausal bleeding an approach for a rational diagnostic workup. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(6):564–569. - PubMed
    1. Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research Getting better but still not good. JAMA. 1995;274(8):645–651. - PubMed
    1. Tsaltas J, Magnus A, Mamers PM, Lawrence AS, Lolatgis N, Healy DL. Laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy a cost comparison. Med J Aust. 1997;166(4):205–207. - PubMed
    1. Flasar MH, Goldberg E. Acute abdominal pain. Med Clin North Am. 2006;90(3):481–503. - PubMed
    1. Ou CS, Rowbotham R. Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of nontraumatic acute abdominal pain in women. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2000;10(1):41–45. - PubMed