Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212633.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212633. eCollection 2019.

Towards a universal concept of vulnerability: Broadening the evidence from the elderly to perinatal health using a Delphi approach

Nynke de Groot  1   2 , Gouke J Bonsel  1   2   3 , Erwin Birnie  4 , Nicole B Valentine  5
Affiliations

Towards a universal concept of vulnerability: Broadening the evidence from the elderly to perinatal health using a Delphi approach

Nynke de Groot et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: The concept 'vulnerability' is prevalent in the public domain, health care, social institutions and multidisciplinary research. Conceptual heterogeneity is present, hampering the creation of a common evidence-base of research achievements and successful policies. Recently an international expert group combined a specific literature review with a 2-stage Delphi procedure, arriving at a seemingly universal concept of vulnerability for the elderly with applications for research instruments. We replicated and extended this study, to generalize this result to health in general, and perinatal health in particular.

Methods: Two independent expert panels (general health, perinatal health) repeated the Delphi-procedure, using an extended and updated literature review to derive statements on the concept and defining pathways of vulnerability. Additional views were collected on research tools. Consensus-by-design was explicitly avoided. Data collection and processing was independent.

Results: Both panels showed surprising convergence on the pathways of vulnerability to health/ill-health, and their interaction. The agreed conceptual model describes a dynamic relation between health and ill-health and vulnerability. The 2 key pathways that link to vulnerability, are complementary, but not symmetrical as biological processes of maintaining health or obtaining better health are not reciprocal to recovery, so also not in terms of vulnerability impacts. An individual's degree of vulnerability is the net balance of risk effects and protective and healing factors (socially, biologically and in terms of health literacy and health care access). These factors can for measurement purposes (according to the panels: interview for exploration, checklists for population research) be grouped into 'material resources', 'taking responsibility for one's own health', 'risky activities and behaviors', and 'social support'. Supportive and transforming action can thus be undertaken.

Conclusion: A universal concept of vulnerability in the context of health was successfully derived after careful replication and extension of an international Delphi study on vulnerability among the elderly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flowchart of the study design for both expert panels and the research team.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Conceptual model of vulnerability for research and practice.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Grabovschi C, Loignon C, Fortin M. Mapping the concept of vulnerability related to health care disparities: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;94: 1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fiscella K, Shin P. The inverse care law. Implications for healthcare of vulnerable populations. J Ambulatory Care Manage. 2005;28: 304–312. - PubMed
    1. Shi L, Stevens GD. Vulnerability and unmet health care needs. The influence of multiple risk factors. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20: 148–154. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40136.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380; 37–43. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. The world health report 2013: research for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013.

Publication types