Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;10(1):123-128.
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677738. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

Using Electronic Health Records to Identify Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Using Electronic Health Records to Identify Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care: A Systematic Review

Chenchen Feng et al. Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: We identified the methods used and determined the roles of electronic health records (EHRs) in detecting and assessing adverse drug events (ADEs) in the ambulatory setting.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature review by searching PubMed and Google Scholar for studies on ADEs detected in the ambulatory setting involving any EHR use published before June 2017. We extracted study characteristics from included studies related to ADE detection methods for analysis.

Results: We identified 30 studies that evaluated ADEs in an ambulatory setting with an EHR. In 27 studies, EHRs were used only as the data source for ADE identification. In two studies, the EHR was used as both a data source and to deliver decision support to providers during order entry. In one study, the EHR was a source of data and generated patient safety reports that researchers used in the process of identifying ADEs. Methods of identification included manual chart review by trained nurses, pharmacists, and/or physicians; prescription review; computer monitors; electronic triggers; International Classification of Diseases codes; natural language processing of clinical notes; and patient phone calls and surveys. Seven studies provided examples of search phrases, laboratory values, and rules used to identify ADEs.

Conclusion: The majority of studies examined used EHRs as sources of data for ADE detection. This retrospective approach is appropriate to measure incidence rates of ADEs but not adequate to detect preventable ADEs before patient harm occurs. New methods involving computer monitors and electronic triggers will enable researchers to catch preventable ADEs and take corrective action.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of included studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zafar A, Hickner J, Pace W, Tierney W. An adverse drug event and medication error reporting system for ambulatory care (MEADERS) AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008;2008:839–843. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Overhage J M, Gandhi T K, Hope C et al.Ambulatory computerized prescribing and preventable adverse drug events. J Patient Saf. 2016;12(02):69–74. - PubMed
    1. Gandhi T K, Weingart S N, Borus J et al.Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1556–1564. - PubMed
    1. Gurwitz J H, Field T S, Harrold L R et al.Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA. 2003;289(09):1107–1116. - PubMed
    1. Hanlon J T, Schmader K E, Koronkowski M J et al.Adverse drug events in high risk older outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(08):945–948. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms