Electronic Health Record Adoption and Nurse Reports of Usability and Quality of Care: The Role of Work Environment
- PMID: 30786302
- PMCID: PMC6382496
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1678551
Electronic Health Record Adoption and Nurse Reports of Usability and Quality of Care: The Role of Work Environment
Abstract
Background: Despite evidence suggesting higher quality and safer care in hospitals with comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) systems, factors related to advanced system usability remain largely unknown, particularly among nurses. Little empirical research has examined sociotechnical factors, such as the work environment, that may shape the relationship between advanced EHR adoption and quality of care.
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the independent and joint effects of comprehensive EHR adoption and the hospital work environment on nurse reports of EHR usability and nurse-reported quality of care and safety.
Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of nurse and hospital survey data. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between EHR adoption level, work environment, and a set of EHR usability and quality/safety outcomes. The sample included 12,377 nurses working in 353 hospitals.
Results: In fully adjusted models, comprehensive EHR adoption was associated with lower odds of nurses reporting poor usability outcomes, such as dissatisfaction with the system (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.92). The work environment was associated with all usability outcomes with nurses in better environments being less likely to report negatively. Comprehensive EHRs (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96) and better work environments (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.42-0.52) were associated with lower odds of nurses reporting fair/poor quality of care, while poor patient safety grade was associated with the work environment (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.46-0.54), but not EHR adoption level.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that adoption of a comprehensive EHR is associated with more positive usability ratings and higher quality of care. We also found that-independent of EHR adoption level-the hospital work environment plays a significant role in how nurses evaluate EHR usability and whether EHRs have their intended effects on improving quality and safety of care.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Similar articles
-
Electronic Health Record Usability: Associations With Nurse and Patient Outcomes in Hospitals.Med Care. 2021 Jul 1;59(7):625-631. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001536. Med Care. 2021. PMID: 33797506 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' and nurses' experiences on EHR usability: Comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand.Int J Med Inform. 2020 Feb;134:104018. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104018. Epub 2019 Oct 24. Int J Med Inform. 2020. PMID: 31835158
-
Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:266-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Int J Med Inform. 2017. PMID: 27919385
-
The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12060-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 39762805 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of healthcare professionals about the adoption and use of EHR in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: a systematic review.BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020 Jan;27(1):e100099. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100099. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020. PMID: 31924667 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content.Life (Basel). 2020 Dec 4;10(12):327. doi: 10.3390/life10120327. Life (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33291615 Free PMC article.
-
Single-Vendor Electronic Health Record Use Is Associated With Greater Opportunities for Organizational and Clinical Care Improvements.Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022 May 31;6(3):269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.05.001. eCollection 2022 Jun. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022. PMID: 35669522 Free PMC article.
-
Adoption of electronic health record systems to enhance the quality of healthcare in low-income countries: a systematic review.BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Jun;30(1):e100704. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100704. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023. PMID: 37308185 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Digital Hospitals on Patient and Clinician Experience: Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 11;26:e47715. doi: 10.2196/47715. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38466978 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of hospital electronic health record (EHR) training, support, and patient safety by staff position and tenure.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11322-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39164672 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adler-Milstein J, Jha A K. HITECH Act drove large gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017;36(08):1416–1422. - PubMed
-
- Henry J, Pylypchuk Y, Searchy T, Patel V. Washington, DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2016. Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. Non-Federal Acute Care Hospitals: 2008–2015. ONC Data Brief 35.
-
- Walker-Czyz A.The impact of an integrated electronic health record adoption on nursing care quality J Nurs Adm 201646(7–8):366–372. - PubMed