Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr;39(4):558-568.
doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.310961.

Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease

Affiliations
Review

Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease

Ann Marie Schmidt. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in people with types 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Although beneficial roles for strict control of hyperglycemia have been suggested, such a strategy is not without liabilities. Specifically, the risk of hypoglycemia and its consequences remain an omnipresent threat with such approaches. The advent of the CVOT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials) for new antidiabetes mellitus treatments has uncovered unexpected benefits of cardiovascular protection in some of the new classes of agents, such as the GLP-1 RAs (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) and the SGLT-2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors. Further, state-of-the-art approaches, such as antibodies to PCKSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9); RNA therapeutics; agents targeting distinct components of the immune/inflammatory response; and novel small molecules that block the actions of RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products) signaling, also hold potential as new therapies for diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Finally, interventions such as weight loss, through bariatric surgery, may hold promise for benefit in diabetes and cardiovascular disease. In this Brief Review, some of the novel approaches and emerging targets for the treatment of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease are discussed. Ultimately, identification of the optimal timing and combinations of such interventions, especially in the context of personalized approaches, together with emerging disease-modifying agents, holds great promise to reduce the burden that diabetes poses to the cardiovascular system.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; diabetes mellitus; receptor for advanced glycation end products; therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Pathobiological mechanisms and therapeutic targets for diabetes and CVD.
(A). Examples of proposed mechanisms of diabetes and CVD. Both endogenous and exogenous forces may converge to increase glucose levels, one consequence of which is the formation nonenzymatically glycated proteins or lipids, called AGEs, or advanced glycation endproducts – factors that have been linked mechanistically to the pathogenesis of CVD. Independently, lipid abnormalities in obesity and diabetes pose independent risk for CVD. Further, these two pathways may converge, as glycation of lipids and lipoproteins has been shown in multiple basic science experiments to regulate factors that aggravate CVD risk. Once ignited, the actions of glucose, AGEs and lipids modulate signaling pathways and factors that regulate gene expression, including microRNAs and lncRNAs. The consequences of these changes in gene expression may be vast, affecting the functions of both vascular cells and immune cells. Indeed, increased “vascular inflammation” occurs in diabetes and leads to the upregulation of factors that augment CVD risk. In addition, long-term epidemiologic studies have underscored that in both T1D and T2D, the effects of hyperglycemia may be long-lived, leading to epigenetic changes that may affect gene expression patterns and CVD risk for many years. Finally, fundamental changes in body mass and reductions in physical activity may portend increased obesity, insulin resistance, and if left unchecked, T2D. (B) Emerging therapeutic strategies in diabetes and metabolic dysfunction to combat CVD. Recent results from CVOTs demonstrated unexpected cardiovascular benefit from the use of newer classes of agents targeting hyperglycemia, namely, the GLP-1 RAs and the SGLT-2 inhibitors. However, the DPP4 inhibitors have not been shown to exert the same degree of benefits in CVD, but may be associated with higher rates of heart failure. Further, some of the members of these classes of agents have been associated with some risks, such as increased mycotic infections, increased retinopathy and risk of amputations, for unclear reasons. For maximally treated with statins subjects or in subjects with statin intolerance, studies have begun to show that the new series of antibodies targeting PCSK9 may exert equivalent benefit in CVD in non-diabetic and diabetic subjects. Recent discoveries on the roles of miRNAs and lncRNAs in diabetic complications in preclinical models may lead to broader testing and use of ASOs and GapmeRs for diabetes and CVD. The recent success of canakinumab, as illustrated in the CANTOS trial, solidified for the first time in a large clinical trial the benefits of targeting inflammation for CVD. In the CANTOS trial, it was shown that diabetic subjects and non-diabetic subjects benefitted from this approach. It is to be noted that there was an increased risk of serious infection in the canakinumab-treated group vs. the placebo. If and how this may affect overall utility for diabetic subjects remains to be determined. In the field of cancer, novel approaches to targeting DNA methylation and histone methylation and acetylation are gaining traction; given the evidence of “metabolic memory” in diabetic complications, such approaches may well soon be tested in diabetes and CVD. Lifestyle interventions, although tantalizing, have long proved to be difficult to achieve and sustain. Recent work has suggested that bariatric surgery may exert possible CVD benefits on account of weight loss, but, as well, to other to-be-elucidated factors (such as changes in gut hormones, as an example). Finally, novel approaches to disease modification, such as antagonism of the RAGE/DIAPH1 signaling pathway, have shown benefit in preclinical models of inflammation and diabetes. Work is ongoing to test these concepts. Note that this review was meant to illustrate but some of recently emerging targets for diabetes and CVD. Given the scope of the epidemics of obesity and diabetes, such efforts are both timely and, potentially, life-saving.

References

    1. Paneni F, Beckman JA, Creager MA, Cosentino F. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: part I. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2436–2443 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Livingstone SJ, Looker HC, Hothersall EJ, et al. Risk of cardiovascular disease and total mortality in adults with type 1 diabetes: Scottish registry linkage study. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001321. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller RG, Costacou T, Orchard TJ. Risk Factor Modeling for Cardiovascular Disease in Type I Diabetes in the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications (EDC) Study: A Comparison to the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study. Diabetes. 2018 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pennells L, Kaptoge S, Wood A, et al. Equalization of four cardiovascular risk algorithms after systematic recalibration: individual-participant meta-analysis of 86 prospective studies. Eur Heart J. 2018 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzen S, Sattar N, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, Zethelius B, Miftaraj M, McGuire DK, Rosengren A, Gudbjornsdottir S. Risk Factors, Mortality, and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:633–644 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms