Pesticide exposure among Bolivian farmers: associations between worker protection and exposure biomarkers
- PMID: 30787424
- PMCID: PMC8608618
- DOI: 10.1038/s41370-019-0128-3
Pesticide exposure among Bolivian farmers: associations between worker protection and exposure biomarkers
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Pesticide exposure among Bolivian farmers: associations between worker protection and exposure biomarkers.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;30(4):768. doi: 10.1038/s41370-019-0149-y. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 31201360 Free PMC article.
-
Correction: Pesticide exposure among Bolivian farmers: associations between worker protection and exposure biomarkers.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;32(5):782. doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00402-9. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 34912028 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
The use of pesticides has increased during the past decades, also increasing the risk of exposure to toxic pesticides that can cause detrimental health effects in the future. This is of special concern among farmers in low-to-middle-income countries that may lack proper training in the safe use of these chemicals. To assess the situation in Bolivia a cross-sectional study in three agricultural communities was performed (n = 297). Handling, use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and pesticide exposure were assessed by a questionnaire and measurements of urinary pesticide metabolites (UPMs). Results showed that methamidophos (65%) and paraquat (52%) were the most commonly used pesticides and that 75% of the farmers combined several pesticides while spraying. Notably, only 17% of the farmers used recommended PPEs while 84% reported to have experienced symptoms of acute pesticide poisoning after spraying. UPM measurements indicated high levels of exposure to chlorpyrifos, pyrethroids and 2,4D and that men generally were more highly exposed compared to women. Our study demonstrates that farmers who are better at following recommendations for pesticide handling and use of PPE had a significantly lower risk of having high UPM levels of most measured pesticides. Our results thus confirm the need of proper training of farmers in low-to-middle-income countries in proper protection and pesticide handling in order to reduce exposure levels and health problems.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- IPCS. WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification 2009. Albany, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.
-
- International agency for research on cancer. iarc monographs—classifications: international agency for research on cancer. 2017. http://www.monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. Accessed september 2018.
-
- Kim KH, Kabir E, Jahan SA. Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects. Sci Total Environ. 2017;575:525–35. - PubMed
-
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Guidelines for personal protection when working with pesticides in tropical climates [Work protection]. Rome: 1990;1990. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticide... Accessed september 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
